Search for: All records

Consistent individual differences in behavior, known as behavioral individuality, are pervasive across the animal world and have major ecological and evolutionary consequences. Nevertheless, we still have a limited understanding of what drives individuality and how it emerges during ontogeny. Here, we subjected clonal individuals to a ubiquitous yet critical environmental challenge—the threat of predation—to disentangle the developmental mechanisms of individuality. Under such a salient environmental stressor, among-individual differences may collapse or expand depending on whether there is a single or multiple optimal strategies, demonstrating that individuality itself is a developmentally plastic trait. If, however, the environment does not impact among-individual variation, this suggests that individuality is determined before birth. We continuously tracked the behavior of genetically identical fish (Amazon mollies, Poecilia formosa), reared with or without predation stress, from birth through their first month of life. Predation shifted mean-level behaviors, with predator-exposed individuals swimming more slowly and spending more time near their refuges. However, the magnitude of individuality (as evidenced by repeatability) increased similarly over development in both treatments, indicating that individuality crystallizes robustly over time, even under stress and in a vacuum of genetic variation. Predator-reared fish also exhibited greater within-individual variability in refuge use, suggesting increased behavioral flexibility or disrupted developmental canalization in response to stress. Surprisingly, maternal identity, but not maternal behavior, was the strongest predictor of swimming speed, pointing to non-behavioral maternal effects as a key pre-birth source of behavioral variation. Refuge use however was not at all predicted by maternal identity, indicating that major fitness-related behaviors can have entirely different developmental mechanisms. Collectively, we show that individuality persists despite environmental stress and is seeded before birth through non-genetic factors. Even in the face of a shared environmental challenge, the behavioral trajectories of individuals are unique. 

The study of individual behavioral variation, sometimes called animal personalities or behavioral types, is now a well-established area of research in behavioral ecology and evolution. Considerable theoretical work has developed predictions about its ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences, and studies testing these theories continue to grow. Here, we synthesize the current empirical work to shed light on which theories are well supported and which need further refinement. We find that the major frameworks explaining the existence of individual behavioral variation, the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis and state-dependent feedbacks models, have mixed support. The consequences of individual behavioral variation are well studied at the individual level but less is known about consequences at higher levels such as among species and communities. The focus of this review is to reevaluate and reestablish the foundation of individual behavioral variation research: What do we know? What questions remain? And where are we going next? 

Abstract Understanding the evolutionary mechanisms underlying the maintenance of individual differences in behavior and physiology is a fundamental goal in ecology and evolution. The pace‐of‐life syndrome hypothesis is often invoked to explain the maintenance of such within‐population variation. This hypothesis predicts that behavioral traits are part of a suite of correlated traits that collectively determine an individual's propensity to prioritize reproduction or survival. A key assumption of this hypothesis is that these traits are underpinned by genetic trade‐offs among life‐history traits: genetic variants that increase fertility, reproduction and growth might also reduce lifespan. We performed a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis to summarize the evidence for the existence of genetic trade‐offs between five key life‐history traits: survival, growth rate, body size, maturation rate, and fertility. Counter to our predictions, we found an overall positive genetic correlation between survival and other life‐history traits and no evidence for any genetic correlations between the non‐survival life‐history traits. This finding was generally consistent across pairs of life‐history traits, sexes, life stages, lab vs. field studies, and narrow‐ vs. broad‐sense correlation estimates. Our study highlights that genetic trade‐offs may not be as common, or at least not as easily quantifiable, in animals as often assumed.