Minimizing porosity is a common challenge in powder bed fusion-laser bed (PBF-LB), so predictive modeling to enable parameter selection free of porosity is of great value. Porosity formation may occur through several mechanisms, include keyholing and lack of fusion. Volumetric energy density is often used in the literature to predict defect formation. However, volumetric energy density does not account for the various mechanisms by which porosity forms. In this work, nine LPBF parameter sets spanning variation in laser power, scanning velocity, and hatch spacing, all with the same volumetric energy density, are evaluated with 316L stainless steel. It was found that there are systematic variations in the type and amount of pores between these parameter sets that have the same volumetric density. We show that defect maps comprised of analytical models for defect formation can predict parameter sets with minimal porosity. A modified interpass lack-of-fusion (LOF) porosity criteria and a new spatter-induced intrapass LOF criteria are proposed to improve predictions at low laser powers and scanning velocities, and at high laser powers and scanning velocities, respectively. The results of this work are expected to help accelerate parameter selection for laser powder bed fusion 316L with minimal porosity defects.
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract -
Abstract Austral summer precipitation increased by 27% from 1902 to 2020 over southeastern South America (SESA), one of the largest centennial precipitation trends observed globally. We assess the influence of the South American low‐level jet on the SESA precipitation trend by analyzing low‐level moisture fluxes into SESA in two reanalysis datasets from 1951 to 2020. Increased moisture flux through the jet accounts for 20%–45% of the observed SESA precipitation trend. While results vary among reanalyzes, both point to increased humidity as a fundamental driver of increased moisture flux and SESA precipitation. Increased humidity within the jet is consistent with warming sea surface temperatures driven by anthropogenic forcing, although additional natural climate variations also may have played a role. The jet's velocity also increased, further enhancing precipitation, but without a clear connection to anthropogenic forcing. Our findings indicate the SESA precipitation trend is partly attributable to jet intensification arising from both natural variability and anthropogenic forcing.