Search for: All records

Polyploidy, or whole-genome duplication, is expected to confound the inference of species trees with phyloge- netic methods for two reasons. First, the presence of retained duplicated genes requires the reconciliation of the inferred gene trees to a proposed species tree. Second, even if the analyses are restricted to shared single copy genes, the occurrence of reciprocal gene loss, where the surviving genes in different species are paralogs from the polyploidy rather than orthologs, will mean that such genes will not have evolved under the corresponding species tree and may not produce gene trees that allow inference of that species tree. Here we analyze three different ancient polyploidy events, using synteny-based inferences of orthology and paralogy to infer gene trees from nearly 17,000 sets of homologous genes. We find that the simple use of single copy genes from polyploid organisms provides reasonably robust phylogenetic signals, despite the presence of reciprocal gene losses. Such gene trees are also most often in accord with the inferred species relationships inferred from maximum likelihood models of gene loss after polyploidy: a completely distinct phylogenetic signal present in these genomes. As seen in other studies, however, we find that methods for inferring phylogenetic confidence yield high support values even in cases where the underlying data suggest meaningful conflict in the phylogenetic signals. 

Hybridization coupled to polyploidy, or allopolyploidy, has dramatically shaped the evolution of flowering plants, teleost fishes, and other lineages. Studies of recently formed allopolyploid plants have shown that the two subgenomes that merged to form that new allopolyploid do not generally express their genes equally. Instead, one of the two subgenomes expresses its paralogs more highly on average. Meanwhile, older allopolyploidy events tend to show biases in duplicate losses, with one of the two subgenomes retaining more genes than the other. Since reduced expression is a pathway to duplicate loss, understanding the origins of expression biases may help explain the origins of biased losses. Because we expect gene expression levels to experience stabilizing selection, our conceptual frameworks for how allopolyploid organisms form tend to assume that the new allopolyploid will show balanced expression between its subgenomes. It is then necessary to invoke phenomena such as differences in the suppression of repetitive elements to explain the observed expression imbalances. Here we show that, even for phenotypically identical diploid progenitors, the inherent kinetics of gene expression give rise to biases between the expression levels of the progenitor genes in the hybrid. Some of these biases are expected to be gene-specific and not give rise to global differences in progenitor gene expression. However, particularly in the case of allopolyploids formed from progenitors with different genome sizes, global expression biases favoring one subgenome are expected immediately on formation. Hence, expression biases are arguably the expectation upon allopolyploid formation rather than a phenomenon needing explanation. In the future, a deeper understanding of the kinetics of allopolyploidy may allow us to better understand both biases in duplicate losses and hybrid vigor. 

Abstract We describe POInT_browse, a web portal that gives access to the orthology inferences made for polyploid genomes with POInT, the Polyploidy Orthology Inference Tool. Ancient, or paleo-, polyploidy events are widely distributed across the eukaryotic phylogeny, and the combination of duplicated and lost duplicated genes that these polyploidies produce can confound the identification of orthologous genes between genomes. POInT uses conserved synteny and phylogenetic models to infer orthologous genes between genomes with a shared polyploidy. It also gives confidence estimates for those orthology inferences. POInT_browsegives both graphical and query-based access to these inferences from 12 different polyploidy events, allowing users to visualize genomic regions produced by polyploidies and perform batch queries for each polyploidy event, downloading genes trees and coding sequences for orthologous genes meeting user-specified criteria. POInT_browseand the associated data are online athttps://wgd.statgen.ncsu.edu. 

Abstract Model species continue to underpin groundbreaking plant science research. At the same time, the phylogenetic resolution of the land plant Tree of Life continues to improve. The intersection of these two research paths creates a unique opportunity to further extend the usefulness of model species across larger taxonomic groups. Here we promote the utility of the Arabidopsis thaliana model species, especially the ability to connect its genetic and functional resources, to species across the entire Brassicales order. We focus on the utility of using genomics and phylogenomics to bridge the evolution and diversification of several traits across the Brassicales to the resources in Arabidopsis, thereby extending scope from a model species by establishing a “model clade”. These Brassicales-wide traits are discussed in the context of both the model species Arabidopsis thaliana and the family Brassicaceae. We promote the utility of such a “model clade” and make suggestions for building global networks to support future studies in the model order Brassicales.