We report a search for a heavy neutral lepton (HNL) that mixes predominantly with. The search utilizes data collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric energycollider. The data sample was collected at and just below the center-of-mass energies of theandresonances and has an integrated luminosity of, corresponding toevents. We search for production of the HNL (denoted) in the decayfollowed by its decay via. The search focuses on the parameter-space region in which the HNL is long-lived, so that theoriginate from a common vertex that is significantly displaced from the collision point of the KEKB beams. Consistent with the expected background yield, one event is observed in the data sample after application of all the event-selection criteria. We report limits on the mixing parameter of the HNL with theneutrino as a function of the HNL mass.
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Published by the American Physical Society 2024 Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2025 -
Explaining the results of Machine learning algorithms is crucial given the rapid growth and potential applicability of these methods in critical domains including healthcare, defense, autonomous driving, etc. In this paper, we address this problem in the context of Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) which are highly expressive statistical relational models that combine first-order logic with probabilistic graphical models. MLNs in general are known to be interpretable models, i.e., MLNs can be understood more easily by humans as compared to models learned by approaches such as deep learning. However, at the same time, it is not straightforward to obtain human-understandable explanations specific to an observed inference result (e.g. marginal probability estimate). This is because, the MLN provides a lifted interpretation, one that generalizes to all possible worlds/instantiations, which are not query/evidence specific. In this paper, we extract grounded-explanations, i.e., explanations defined w.r.t specific inference queries and observed evidence. We extract these explanations from importance weights defined over the MLN formulas that encode the contribution of formulas towards the final inference results. We validate our approach in real world problems related to analyzing reviews from Yelp, and show through user-studies that our explanations are richer than state-of-the-art non-relational explainers such as LIME .more » « less
-
We measure the branching fraction of the decayusing data collected with the Belle II detector. The data contain 387 millionpairs produced incollisions at theresonance. We reconstructdecays from an analysis of the distributions of theenergy and thehelicity angle. We determine the branching fraction to be, in agreement with previous results. Our measurement improves the relative precision of the world average by more than a factor of two.
Published by the American Physical Society 2024 Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2025 -
We report a measurement of decay-time-dependent charge-parity () asymmetries indecays. We usepairs collected at theresonance with the Belle II detector at the SuperKEKB asymmetric-energy electron-positron collider. We reconstruct 220 signal events and extract the-violating parametersandfrom a fit to the distribution of the decay-time difference between the twomesons. The resulting confidence region is consistent with previous measurements inanddecays and with predictions based on the standard model.
Published by the American Physical Society 2024 Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2025 -
We search for the rare decayin asample of electron-positron collisions at theresonance collected with the Belle II detector at the SuperKEKB collider. We use the inclusive properties of the accompanyingmeson inevents to suppress background from other decays of the signalcandidate and light-quark pair production. We validate the measurement with an auxiliary analysis based on a conventional hadronic reconstruction of the accompanyingmeson. For background suppression, we exploit distinct signal features using machine learning methods tuned with simulated data. The signal-reconstruction efficiency and background suppression are validated through various control channels. The branching fraction is extracted in a maximum likelihood fit. Our inclusive and hadronic analyses yield consistent results for thebranching fraction ofand, respectively. Combining the results, we determine the branching fraction of the decayto be, providing the first evidence for this decay at 3.5 standard deviations. The combined result is 2.7 standard deviations above the standard model expectation.
Published by the American Physical Society 2024 Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2025 -
A bstract We report results from a study of
B ± → DK ± decays followed byD decaying to theCP -even final stateK +K − and CP-odd final state , where$$ {K}_S^0{\pi}^0 $$ D is an admixture ofD 0and states. These decays are sensitive to the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity-triangle angle$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$ ϕ 3. The results are based on a combined analysis of the final data set of 772× 106 pairs collected by the Belle experiment and a data set of 198$$ B\overline{B} $$ × 106 pairs collected by the Belle II experiment, both in electron-positron collisions at the Υ(4$$ B\overline{B} $$ S ) resonance. We measure the CP asymmetries to be$$ \mathcal{A} $$ CP += (+12.5± 5.8± 1.4)% and$$ \mathcal{A} $$ CP− = (− 16.7± 5.7± 0.6)%, and the ratios of branching fractions to be$$ \mathcal{R} $$ CP += 1.164± 0.081± 0.036 and$$ \mathcal{R} $$ CP− = 1.151± 0.074± 0.019. The first contribution to the uncertainties is statistical, and the second is systematic. The asymmetries$$ \mathcal{A} $$ CP +and$$ \mathcal{A} $$ CP− have similar magnitudes and opposite signs; their difference corresponds to 3.5 standard deviations. From these values we calculate 68.3% confidence intervals of (8.5° <ϕ 3< 16.5° ) or (84.5° <ϕ 3< 95.5° ) or (163.3° <ϕ 3< 171.5° ) and 0.321 <r B < 0.465.Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 1, 2025 -
Free, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2025
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2024
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available October 1, 2024