Search for: All records

Nucleus decompositions have been shown to be a useful tool for finding dense subgraphs. The coreness value of a clique represents its density based on the number of other cliques it is adjacent to. One useful output of nucleus decomposition is to generate a hierarchy among dense subgraphs at different resolutions. However, existing parallel algorithms for nucleus decomposition do not generate this hierarchy, and only compute the coreness values. This paper presents a scalable parallel algorithm for hierarchy construction, with practical optimizations, such as interleaving the coreness computation with hierarchy construction and using a concurrent union-find data structure in an innovative way to generate the hierarchy. We also introduce a parallel approximation algorithm for nucleus decomposition, which achieves much lower span in theory and better performance in practice. We prove strong theoretical bounds on the work and span (parallel time) of our algorithms. On a 30-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our parallel hierarchy construction algorithm achieves up to a 58.84x speedup over the state-of-the-art sequential hierarchy construction algorithm by Sariyuce et al. and up to a 30.96x self-relative parallel speedup. On the same machine, our approximation algorithm achieves a 3.3x speedup over our exact algorithm, while generating coreness estimates with a multiplicative error of 1.33x on average. 

A fundamental building block in any graph algorithm is agraph container -- a data structure used to represent the graph. Ideally, a graph container enables efficient access to the underlying graph, has low space usage, and supports updating the graph efficiently. In this paper, we conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of graph containers designed to support running algorithms on large graphs. To our knowledge, this is the firstapples-to-applescomparison of graph containers rather than overall systems, which include confounding factors such as differences in algorithm implementations and infrastructure. We measure the running time of 10 highly-optimized algorithms across over 20 different containers and 10 graphs. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that the average algorithm running time does not differ much across containers, especially those that support dynamic updates. Specifically, a simple container based on an off-the-shelf B-tree is only 1.22× slower on average than a highly optimized static one. Moreover, we observe that simplifying a graph-container Application Programming Interface (API) to only a few simple functions incurs a mere 1.16× slowdown compared to a complete API. Finally, we also measure batch-insert throughput in dynamic-graph containers for a full picture of their performance. To perform the benchmarks, we introduce BYO, a unified framework that standardizes evaluations of graph-algorithm performance across different graph containers. BYO extends the Graph Based Benchmark Suite (Dhulipala et al. 18), a state-of-the-art graph algorithm benchmark, to easily plug into different dynamic graph containers and enable fair comparisons between them on a large suite of graph algorithms. While several graph algorithm benchmarks have been developed to date, to the best of our knowledge, BYO is the first system designed to benchmark graph containers. 

The SetCover problem has been extensively studied in many different models of computation, including parallel and distributed settings. From an approximation point of view, there are two standard guarantees: an O(log Δ)-approximation (where Δ is the maximum set size) and an O(f)-approximation (where f is the maximum number of sets containing any given element). In this paper, we introduce a new, surprisingly simple, model-independent approach to solving SetCover in unweighted graphs. We obtain multiple improved algorithms in the MPC and CRCW PRAM models. First, in the MPC model with sublinear space per machine, our algorithms can compute an O(f) approximation to SetCover in Ô(√{log Δ} + log f) rounds and a O(log Δ) approximation in O(log^{3/2} n) rounds. Moreover, in the PRAM model, we give a O(f) approximate algorithm using linear work and O(log n) depth. All these bounds improve the existing round complexity/depth bounds by a log^{Ω(1)} n factor. Moreover, our approach leads to many other new algorithms, including improved algorithms for the HypergraphMatching problem in the MPC model, as well as simpler SetCover algorithms that match the existing bounds.