Search for: All records

A bstract We consider the Seiberg-Witten solution of pure $$ \mathcal{N} $$ N = 2 gauge theory in four dimensions, with gauge group SU( N ). A simple exact series expansion for the dependence of the 2( N − 1) Seiberg-Witten periods a I ( u ) , a DI ( u ) on the N − 1 Coulomb-branch moduli u n is obtained around the ℤ 2 N -symmetric point of the Coulomb branch, where all u n vanish. This generalizes earlier results for N = 2 in terms of hypergeometric functions, and for N = 3 in terms of Appell functions. Using these and other analytical results, combined with numerical computations, we explore the global structure of the Kähler potential K = $$ \frac{1}{2}{\sum}_I $$ 1 2 ∑ I Im( $$ \overline{a} $$ a ¯ I a DI ), which is single valued on the Coulomb branch. Evidence is presented that K is a convex function, with a unique minimum at the ℤ 2 N -symmetric point. Finally, we explore candidate walls of marginal stability in the vicinity of this point, and their relation to the surface of vanishing Kähler potential. 

A bstract Motivated by applications to soft supersymmetry breaking, we revisit the expansion of the Seiberg-Witten solution around the multi-monopole point on the Coulomb branch of pure SU( N ) $$ \mathcal{N} $$ N = 2 gauge theory in four dimensions. At this point N − 1 mutually local magnetic monopoles become massless simultaneously, and in a suitable duality frame the gauge couplings logarithmically run to zero. We explicitly calculate the leading threshold corrections to this logarithmic running from the Seiberg-Witten solution by adapting a method previously introduced by D’Hoker and Phong. We compare our computation to existing results in the literature; this includes results specific to SU(2) and SU(3) gauge theories, the large- N results of Douglas and Shenker, as well as results obtained by appealing to integrable systems or topological strings. We find broad agreement, while also clarifying some lingering inconsistencies. Finally, we explicitly extend the results of Douglas and Shenker to finite N , finding exact agreement with our first calculation.