skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Feldmann, Sina"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. The visual control of locomotion has been modeled for individual pedestrian behavior; however, this approach has not been applied to collective human behavior, where spontaneous pattern formation is often observed. We hypothesize that an empirical visual model of human locomotion will reproduce the emergent pattern of lanes and stripes observed in crossing flows, when two groups of pedestrians walk through each other at crosswalks or intersections. Mullick, et al. (2022) manipulated the crossing angle between two groups and found an invariant property: stripe orientation is perpendicular to the mean walking direction (i.e. 90˚ to the bisectrix of the crossing angle). Here we determine the combination of model components required to simulate human-like stripes: (i) steering to a goal (Fajen & Warren, 2003), (ii) collision avoidance with opponents (Bai, 2022; Veprek & Warren, VSS 2023), and (iii) alignment with neighbors (Dachner, et al., 2022), together called the SCruM (Self-organized Collective Motion) model. We performed multi-agent simulations of the data from Mullick et al. (2022), using fixed parameters and initial conditions from the dataset. There were two sets of participants (N=36, 38) with 18 or 19 per group. Crossing angle varied from 60˚ to 180˚ (30˚ intervals), with ~17 trials per condition. The minimal model necessary to reproduce stripe formation consists of the goal and collision avoidance components. Mean stripe orientation did not differ from 90˚ to the bisectrix (BF10 < 0.01, decisive). However, the SD of heading during crossing was significantly larger than the human data (p<0.001), whereas the SD of speed was significantly smaller (p<0.001). Thus, the ratio of heading/speed adjustments is lower than previously found, implying the need to reparameterize model components for walking in groups. In sum, steering to a goal and collision avoidance are sufficient to explain stripe formation in crossing flows, while alignment is unnecessary. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 15, 2026
  2. Nicolas, A; Bain, N; Douin, A; Ramos, O; Furno, A (Ed.)
    Crossing flows of pedestrians result in collective motions containing self-organized lanes or stripes. Over a wide range of crossing angles, stripe orientation is observed to be perpendicular to the mean walking direction. Here, we test the behavioral components needed to reproduce the lanes and stripes in human data using an empirical, vision-based pedestrian model (Visual SCruM). We examine combinations of (i) steering toward a goal, (ii) collision avoidance, and (iii) alignment (both with and without visual occlusion). The minimal model sufficient to reproduce perpendicular stripes was the combination of a common goal and collision avoidance, although the addition of alignment with occlusion better approximated human heading adjustments. However, the model overestimated the variation in heading and underestimated the variation in speed, suggesting that recalibration of the collision avoidance component is needed. 
    more » « less