- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources3
- Resource Type
-
0000000003000000
- More
- Availability
-
30
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
George, Daniel (3)
-
Haas, Roland (2)
-
Habib, Sarah (2)
-
Huerta, E. A. (2)
-
Rebei, Adam (2)
-
Allen, Gabrielle (1)
-
Andreoni, Igor (1)
-
Antelis, Javier M. (1)
-
Bachelet, Etienne (1)
-
Berriman, G. Bruce (1)
-
Bianco, Federica B. (1)
-
Biswas, Rahul (1)
-
Bleris, Leonidas (1)
-
Carrasco Kind, Matias (1)
-
Chard, Kyle (1)
-
Cho, Minsik (1)
-
Cogan, Stuart_F (1)
-
Cowperthwaite, Philip S. (1)
-
Etienne, Zachariah B. (1)
-
Fishbach, Maya (1)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Objective. The safe delivery of electrical current to neural tissue depends on many factors, yet previous methods for predicting tissue damage rely on only a few stimulation parameters. Here, we report the development of a machine learning approach that could lead to a more reliable method for predicting electrical stimulation-induced tissue damage by incorporating additional stimulation parameters.Approach. A literature search was conducted to build an initial database of tissue response information after electrical stimulation, categorized as either damaging or non-damaging. Subsequently, we used ordinal encoding and random forest for feature selection, and investigated four machine learning models for classification: Logistic Regression, K-nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Multilayer Perceptron. Finally, we compared the results of these models against the accuracy of the Shannon equation.Main Results. We compiled a database with 387 unique stimulation parameter combinations collected from 58 independent studies conducted over a period of 47 years, with 195 (51%) categorized as non-damaging and 190 (49%) categorized as damaging. The features selected for building our model with a Random Forest algorithm were: waveform shape, geometric surface area, pulse width, frequency, pulse amplitude, charge per phase, charge density, current density, duty cycle, daily stimulation duration, daily number of pulses delivered, and daily accumulated charge. The Shannon equation yielded an accuracy of 63.9% using akvalue of 1.79. In contrast, the Random Forest algorithm was able to robustly predict whether a set of stimulation parameters was classified as damaging or non-damaging with an accuracy of 88.3%.Significance. This novel Random Forest model can facilitate more informed decision making in the selection of neuromodulation parameters for both research studies and clinical practice. This study represents the first approach to use machine learning in the prediction of stimulation-induced neural tissue damage, and lays the groundwork for neurostimulation driven by machine learning models.more » « less
-
Rebei, Adam; Huerta, E. A.; Wang, Sibo; Habib, Sarah; Haas, Roland; Johnson, Daniel; George, Daniel (, Physical Review D)
-
Huerta, E. A.; Allen, Gabrielle; Andreoni, Igor; Antelis, Javier M.; Bachelet, Etienne; Berriman, G. Bruce; Bianco, Federica B.; Biswas, Rahul; Carrasco Kind, Matias; Chard, Kyle; et al (, Nature Reviews Physics)
An official website of the United States government
