Search for: All records

{"Abstract":["Distributed Systems are commonly built using a set of standard assumptions: we assume that message delays are unbounded, that any packet can be lost in the network, and that clocks cannot be closely synchronized. On the one hand, these conservative assumptions result in robust systems that can operate reliably in a wide variety of conditions. On the other hand, they also force the system to do a lot of complex ad-hoc coordination and thus limit the performance it can achieve. \r\nIn this paper, we take a look at what lies beyond this standard model. We observe that, on modern hardware in a single-tenant data center, distributed systems are able to closely coordinate and essentially "run like clockwork" with very little effort. If we are willing to additionally rule out some worst-case failure scenarios, this results in a large performance improvement, both in practice and even in theory. We demonstrate this effect using state-machine replication (SMR) as a case study: our SMR protocol, Watchmaker, exceeds the throughput of state-of-the-art algorithms by two orders of magnitude, and it requires only half as many replicas to tolerate the same number of faults."]} 

As multicore hardware becomes increasingly prevalent in real-time embedded systems, traditional scheduling techniques that assume a single worst-case execution time for each task are no longer adequate, as they fail to account for the impact of shared resources—such as cache and memory bandwidth—on execution time. When tasks execute concurrently on different cores, their execution times can vary substantially with their allocated resources. Moreover, the instruction rate of a task during a job execution varies with time, and this variation pattern differs across tasks. Therefore, to improve performance it is crucial to incorporate the relationship between the resource budget allocated to each task and its time-varying instruction rate in task modeling, resource allocation, and scheduling algorithm design. Yet, no prior work has considered the fine-grained dynamic resource allocation and scheduling problems jointly while also providing hard real-time guarantees. In this article, we introduce a resource-dependent multi-phase timing model that captures the time-varying instruction rates of a task under different resource allocations and that enables worst-case analysis under dynamic allocation. We present a method for constructing estimates of such a model based on task execution profiles, which can be obtained through measurements. We then presentRasco, a co-design technique for multicore resource allocation and scheduling of real-time DAG applications with end-to-end deadlines.Rascoleverages the resource-dependent multi-phase model of each task to simultaneously allocate resources at a fine granularityandassign task deadlines. This approach maximizes execution progress under resource constraints while providing hard real-time schedulability guarantees. Our evaluation shows thatRascosubstantially enhances schedulability and reduces end-to-end latency compared to the state of the art. 

When scheduling multi-mode real-time systems on multi-core platforms, a key question is how to dynamically adjust shared resources, such as cache and memory bandwidth, when resource demands change, without jeopardizing schedulability during mode changes. This paper presents Omni, a first end-to-end solution to this problem. Omni consists of a novel multi-mode resource allocation algorithm and a resource-aware schedulability test that supports general mode-change semantics as well as dynamic cache and bandwidth resource allocation. Omni's resource allocation leverages the platform's concurrency and the diversity of the tasks' demands to minimize overload during mode transitions; it does so by intelligently co-distributing tasks and resources across cores. Omni's schedulability test ensures predictable mode transitions, and it takes into account mode-change effects on the resource demands on different cores, so as to best match their dynamic needs using the available resources. We have implemented a prototype of Omni, and we have evaluated it using randomly generated multi-mode systems with several real-world benchmarks as the workload. Our results show that Omni has low overhead, and that it is substantially more effective in improving schedulability than the state of the art 

Modern latency-sensitive and real-time systems often use multi-core platforms; thus, tasks on different cores share certain hardware resources, such as the memory bus and certain cache levels. This has two undesirable consequences: (1) tasks can interfere with each other, causing high latency for the system as a whole, and (2) it becomes difficult to meet deadlines, since the worst-case timing of a given task depends on the worst task it might have to compete with. Static partitioning isolates tasks from each other by allocating a certain fraction of the resources to each; however, many tasks execute in different phases (e.g., memory-intensive and CPU-intensive) that have different requirements. Thus, system designers are left with a choice between overprovisioning, based on the most demanding phase, or suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose a pair of techniques, called DNA and DADNA, to address the above challenge. DNA increases throughput and decreases latency, by building an execution profile of each task to identify the phases, and then dynamically allocating resources based on which task can benefit the most; DADNA further adds support for soft real-time workloads by taking deadlines into account. We have built a prototype of both techniques in the Xen hypervisor; our experimental results show that, compared to a state-of-the-art solution, DNA and DADNA can substantially improve schedulability, reduce job deadline miss ratios, and cut latencies by more than a factor of two even in extremely overloaded situations.