skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Gillman, Andrew"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) is a type of additive manufacturing process that builds parts out of metal powder in a layerwise fashion. Quality control (QC) remains an unsolved problem for PBF. Data-driven models of PBF are expensive to train and maintain, in terms of materials and machine time, because they are sensitive to changes in processing conditions.The length and time scale discrepancies of the process make physics-based modeling impractical to implement. We propose monitoring PBF with an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). The EnKF combines the computational efficiency of datadriven models with the flexibility of physics-based models, while mitigating the flaws of either method. We validate EnKF performance for linear process models, using finite element method data in place of measured experimental data. We show that the EnKF can reduce the error signal 2-norm and 1-norm relative to the open loop model by as much as 75%. 
    more » « less
  2. Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) faces ongoing challenges in the areas of process monitoring and control. Standard methods for alleviating these issues rely on machine learning, which requires costly and time-consuming training data. Expense is compounded by the perceived necessity of using sensors with extremely high resolutions. This research avoids this cost by employing an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF), which uses measured data to correct physics-based model predictions of the process, to monitor part internal temperature fields during building. This work tests EnKF performance, in simulation, for two model architectures, using simulated cameras of varying resolution as our measuring instruments. Crucially, we show that increasing camera resolution produces diminishing returns in EnKF accuracy, relative to the model predictions, with up to 81% error reduction. This result shows that current AM quality control practices with expensive sensors may be inefficient; with appropriate algorithms, cheaper setups may be used with little additional error. 
    more » « less