Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 8, 2025
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 1, 2025
-
The performance of inference with machine learning (ML) models and its integration with analytical query processing have become critical bottlenecks for data analysis in many organizations. An ML inference pipeline typically consists of a preprocessing workflow followed by prediction with an ML model. Current approaches for in-database inference implement preprocessing operators and ML algorithms in the database either natively, by transpiling code to SQL, or by executing user-defined functions in guest languages such as Python. In this work, we present a radically different approach that approximates an end-to-end inference pipeline (preprocessing plus prediction) using a light-weight embedding that discretizes a carefully selected subset of the input features and an index that maps data points in the embedding space to aggregated predictions of an ML model. We replace a complex preprocessing workflow and model-based inference with a simple feature transformation and an index lookup. Our framework improves inference latency by several orders of magnitude while maintaining similar prediction accuracy compared to the pipeline it approximates.
Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 1, 2025 -
The problem of comparing database instances with incom- pleteness is prevalent in applications such as analyzing how a dataset has evolved over time (e.g., data versioning), evaluating data cleaning solutions (e.g., compare an instance produced by a data repair algorithm against a gold standard), or comparing solu- tions generated by data exchange systems (e.g., universal vs core solutions). In this work, we propose a framework for computing similarity of instances with labeled nulls, even of those without primary keys. As a side-effect, the similarity score computation returns a mapping between the instances’ tuples, which explains the score. We demonstrate that computing the similarity of two incomplete instances is NP-hard in the instance size in general. To be able to compare instances of realistic size, we present an approximate PTIME algorithm for instance comparison. Exper- imental results demonstrate that the approximate algorithm is up to three orders of magnitude faster than an exact algorithm for the computation of the similarity score, while the difference between approximate and exact scores is always smaller than 1%.more » « less
-
Uncertainty arises naturally in many application domains due to, e.g., data entry errors and ambiguity in data cleaning. Prior work in incomplete and probabilistic databases has investigated the semantics and efficient evaluation of ranking and top-k queries over uncertain data. However, most approaches deal with top-k and ranking in isolation and do represent uncertain input data and query results using separate, incompatible data models. We present an efficient approach for under- and over-approximating results of ranking, top-k, and window queries over uncertain data. Our approach integrates well with existing techniques for querying uncertain data, is efficient, and is to the best of our knowledge the first to support windowed aggregation. We design algorithms for physical operators for uncertain sorting and windowed aggregation, and implement them in PostgreSQL. We evaluated our approach on synthetic and real world datasets, demonstrating that it outperforms all competitors, and often produces more accurate results.more » « less
-
In this work, we demonstrate CaJaDE (Context-Aware Join-Augmented Deep Explanations), a system that explains query results by augmenting provenance with contextual information from other related tables in the database. Given two query results whose difference the user wants to understand, we enumerate possible ways of joining the provenance (i.e., contributing input tuples) of these two query results with tuples from other relevant tables in the database that were not used in the query. We use patterns to concisely explain the difference between the augmented provenance of the two query results. CaJaDE, through a comprehensive UI, enables the user to formulate questions and explore explanations interactively.more » « less