Search for: All records

Mammalian hearing operates on three basic steps: 1) sound capturing, 2) impedance conversion, and 3) frequency analysis. While these canonical steps are vital for acoustic communication and survival in mammals, they are not unique to them. An equivalent mechanism has been described for katydids (Insecta), and it is unique to this group among invertebrates. The katydid inner ear resembles an uncoiled cochlea, and has a length less than 1 mm. Their inner ears contain a hearing organ,crista acustica, which holds tonotopically arranged sensory cells for frequency mapping via travelling waves. Thecrista acusticais located on a curved triangular surface formed by the dorsal wall of the ear canal. While empirical recordings show tonotopic vibrations in the katydid inner ear for frequency analysis, the biophysical mechanism leading to tonotopy remains elusive due to the small size and complexity of the hearing organ. In this study, robust numerical simulations are developed for anin silicoinvestigation of this process. Simulations are based on the precise katydid inner ear geometry obtained by synchrotron-based micro-computed tomography, and empirically determined inner ear fluid properties for an accurate representation of the underlying mechanism. We demonstrate that the triangular structure below the hearing organ drives the tonotopy and travelling waves in the inner ear, and thus has an equivalent role to the mammalian basilar membrane. This reveals a stronger analogy between the inner ear basic mechanical networks of two organisms with ancient evolutionary differences and independent phylogenetic histories. 

Synthetic ammonia production by the Haber–Bosch process revolutionized agriculture by making relatively inexpensive nitrogen (N) fertilizer widely available and enabling a rise in global food production1,2. The Haber–Bosch process relies on fossil fuels (known as grey ammonia production) and emits more than 450 Mt of CO2 annually3. Green ammonia, which is produced using renewable energy, offers a pathway to decouple ammonia production from fossil fuels and reduce CO2 emissions. As a carbon-free fuel, green ammonia could partially replace fossil fuels to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors such as maritime shipping4. However, the widespread use of green ammonia could have complex environmental and social consequences, as it threatens to add reactive N into the biosphere3 and could disrupt fertilizer markets. In this Comment, we identify opportunities, barriers and open questions related to green ammonia production and usage as a fertilizer and beyond. We then recommend research priorities to avoid unforeseen consequences through research, monitoring and adaptation in real time. 

Abstract Phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) are essential nutrients for food production but their excess use in agriculture can have major social costs, particularly related to water quality degradation. Nutrient footprint approaches estimate N and P release to the environment through food production and waste management and enable linking these emissions to particular consumption patterns. Following an established method for quantifying a consumer-oriented N footprint for the United States (U.S.), we calculate an analogous P footprint and assess the N:P ratio across different stages of food production and consumption. Circa 2012, the average consumer’s P footprint was 4.4 kg P capita⁻¹yr⁻¹compared to 22.4 kg N capita⁻¹yr⁻¹for the food portion of the N footprint. Animal products have the largest contribution to both footprints, comprising >70% of the average per capita N and P footprints. The N:P ratio of environmental release based on virtual nutrient factors (kilograms N or P per kilogram of food consumed) varies considerably across food groups and stages. The overall N:P ratio of the footprints was lower (5.2 by mass) than for that of U.S. food consumption (8.6), reinforcing our finding that P is managed less efficiently than N in food production systems but more efficiently removed from wastewater. While strategies like reducing meat consumption will effectively reduce both N and P footprints by decreasing overall synthetic fertilizer nutrient demands, consideration of how food production and waste treatment differentially affect N and P releases to the environment can also inform eutrophication management.