skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Gupta, Chitrak"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. The aerobic electron transfer chain builds a proton gradient by proton coupled electron transfer reactions through a series of proteins. Complex I is the 昀椀rst enzyme in the sequence. Here transfer of two electrons from NADH to quinone yields four protons pumped from the membrane N- (negative, higher pH) side to the P- (positive, lower pH) side. Protons move through three linear antiporter paths, with a few amino acids and waters providing the route; and through the E-channel, a complex of competing paths, with clusters of interconnected protonatable residues. Proton loading sites (PLS) transiently bind protons as they are transported from N- to P-compartments. PLS can be individual residues or extended clusters of residues. The program MCCE uses Monte Carlos sampling to analyze the E-channel proton binding in equilibrium with individual Molecular Dynamics snapshots from tra- jectories of Thermus thermuphillus Complex I in the apo, quinone and quinol bound states. At pH 7, the 昀椀ve E- channel subunits (Nqo4, Nqo7, Nqo8, Nqo10, and Nqo11) take >25,000 protonation microstates, each with different residues protonated. The microstate explosion is tamed by analyzing interconnected clusters of residues along the proton transfer paths. A proton is bound and released from a cluster of 昀椀ve coupled residues on the protein N-side and to six coupled residues in the protein center. Loaded microstates bind protons to sites closer to the P-side in the forward pumping direction. MCCE microstate analysis identi昀椀es strongly coupled proton binding amongst individual residues in the two PLS clusters. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2026
  2. Abstract

    Mutations in theTP53tumor suppressor gene occur in >80% of the triple-negative or basal-like breast cancer. To test whether neomorphic functions of specificTP53missense mutations contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity, we characterized phenotypes of non-transformed MCF10A-derived cell lines expressing the ten most common missense mutant p53 proteins and observed a wide spectrum of phenotypic changes in cell survival, resistance to apoptosis and anoikis, cell migration, invasion and 3D mammosphere architecture. The p53 mutants R248W, R273C, R248Q, and Y220C are the most aggressive while G245S and Y234C are the least, which correlates with survival rates of basal-like breast cancer patients. Interestingly, a crucial amino acid difference at one position—R273C vs. R273H—has drastic changes on cellular phenotype. RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq analyses show distinct DNA binding properties of different p53 mutants, yielding heterogeneous transcriptomics profiles, and MD simulation provided structural basis of differential DNA binding of different p53 mutants. Integrative statistical and machine-learning-based pathway analysis on gene expression profiles with phenotype vectors across the mutant cell lines identifies quantitative association of multiple pathways including the Hippo/YAP/TAZ pathway with phenotypic aggressiveness. Further, comparative analyses of large transcriptomics datasets on breast cancer cell lines and tumors suggest that dysregulation of the Hippo/YAP/TAZ pathway plays a key role in driving the cellular phenotypes towards basal-like in the presence of more aggressive p53 mutants. Overall, our study describes distinct gain-of-function impacts on protein functions, transcriptional profiles, and cellular behaviors of different p53 missense mutants, which contribute to clinical phenotypic heterogeneity of triple-negative breast tumors.

     
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
  4. null (Ed.)
  5. null (Ed.)