skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Haiducek, John D."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract

    We have developed a new procedure for combining lists of substorm onset times from multiple sources. We apply this procedure to observational data and to magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model output from 1–31 January 2005. We show that this procedure is capable of rejecting false positive identifications and filling data gaps that appear in individual lists. The resulting combined onset lists produce a waiting time distribution that is comparable to previously published results, and superposed epoch analyses of the solar wind driving conditions and magnetospheric response during the resulting onset times are also comparable to previous results. Comparison of the substorm onset list from the MHD model to that obtained from observational data reveals that the MHD model reproduces many of the characteristic features of the observed substorms, in terms of solar wind driving, magnetospheric response, and waiting time distribution. Heidke skill scores show that the MHD model has statistically significant skill in predicting substorm onset times.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    There is considerable evidence that current sheet scattering (CSS) plays an important role in isotropic boundary (IB) formation during quiet time. However, IB formation can also result from scattering by electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves, which are much more prevalent during storm time. The effectiveness of CSS can be estimated by the parameter, the ratio of the field line radius of curvature to the particle gyroradius. Using magnetohydrodynamic and empirical models, we estimated the parameterKassociated with storm time IB observations on the nightside. We used magnetic field observations from spacecraft in the magnetotail to estimate and correct for errors in theKvalues computed by the models. We find that the magnetohydrodynamic and empirical models produce fairly similar results without correction and that correction increases this similarity. Accounting for uncertainty in both the latitude of the IB and the threshold value ofKrequired for CSS, we found that 29–54% of the IB observations satisfied the criteria for CSS. We found no correlation between the correctedKand magnetic local time, which further supports the hypothesis that CSS played a significant role in forming the observed IBs.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Recent studies have found that even during quiet times, observed proton isotropic boundaries (IBs) are often projected to the region of high adiabaticity parameter (K≈30), whereis the ratio of magnetic field line radius of curvature to the particle gyroradius. This contradicts the accepted hypothesis that current sheet scattering (CSS) is the dominant mechanism of IB formation becauseK≈8 would be expected for this mechanism. We used magnetohydrodynamic simulations and empirical models to computeKfor 30‐keV proton IB observations within 3 hr of local midnight. We found that neither class of model reliably estimatesKunless supported by magnetic field observations in the current sheet. magnetohydrodynamic simulations produced higherKvalues than expected for CSS (K = 15–30), and empirical models gave lower values (K < 4). We obtained reliable estimates ofKby controlling for the accuracy of the normal component and the gradient of the radial component in the neutral sheet, using observations from three Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms satellites. For the first time, we demonstrated that both these variables should be taken into account for the accurate estimation of the curvature radius. This greatly reduced the spread ofKvalues, indicating that much of the previous spread was due to errors in the magnetic field but also that these errors can be controlled. Most of the corrected values fall within the expected range for CSS, supporting the hypothesis that the IB's were formed by CSS. Accounting for all model results, we obtain an average corrected value ofK = 6.0.

     
    more » « less