- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources2
- Resource Type
-
20
- Availability
-
20
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Fares, Chaker (2)
-
Grundmann, Marius (2)
-
Hassa, Anna (2)
-
Pearton, S. J. (2)
-
Ren, Fan (2)
-
Xia, Xinyi (2)
-
von Wenckstern, Holger (2)
-
Al-Mamun, Nahid Sultan (1)
-
Haque, Aman (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Ahmed, Khadija. (0)
-
& Akcil-Okan, O. (0)
-
& Akuom, D. (0)
-
& Aleven, V. (0)
-
& Andrews-Larson, C. (0)
-
& Archibald, J. (0)
-
& Attari, S. Z. (0)
-
& Ayala, O. (0)
-
& Babbitt, W. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
:Chaosong Huang, Gang Lu (0)
-
A. Agarwal (0)
-
A. Beygelzimer (0)
-
A. E. Lischka (0)
-
A. E. Lischka, E. B. (0)
-
A. E. Lischka, E.B. Dyer (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
X Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy was used to measure valence band offsets for Al 2 O 3 deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition on α -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 alloys over a wide range of Al contents, x, from 0.26–0.74, corresponding to a bandgap range from 5.8–7 eV. These alloys were grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition. The band alignments were type I (nested) at x <0.5, with valence band offsets 0.13 eV for x = 0.26 and x = 0.46. At higher Al contents, the band alignment was a staggered alignment, with valence band offsets of − 0.07 eV for x = 0.58 and −0.17 for x = 0.74, ie. negative valence band offsets in both cases. The conduction band offsets are also small at these high Al contents, being only 0.07 eV at x = 0.74. The wide bandgap of the α -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 alloys makes it difficult to find dielectrics with nested band alignments over the entire composition range.
-
Xia, Xinyi ; Fares, Chaker ; Ren, Fan ; Hassa, Anna ; von Wenckstern, Holger ; Grundmann, Marius ; Pearton, S. J. ( , ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology)Valence band offsets for SiO 2 deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition on α -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 alloys with x = 0.26–0.74 were measured by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. The samples were grown with a continuous composition spread to enable investigations of the band alignment as a function of the alloy composition. From measurement of the core levels in the alloys, the bandgaps were determined to range from 5.8 eV (x = 0.26) to 7 eV (x = 0.74). These are consistent with previous measurements by transmission spectroscopy. The valence band offsets of SiO 2 with these alloys of different composition were, respectively, were −1.2 eV for x = 0.26, −0.2 eV for x = 0.42, 0.2 eV for x = 0.58 and 0.4 eV for x = 0.74. All of these band offsets are too low for most device applications. Given the bandgap of the SiO 2 was 8.7 eV, this led to conduction band offsets of 4.1 eV (x = 0.26) to 1.3 eV (x = 0.74). The band alignments were of the desired nested configuration for x > 0.5, but at lower Al contents the conduction band offsets were negative, with a staggered bandmore »alignment. This shows the challenge of finding appropriate dielectrics for this ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor system.« less