- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources1
- Resource Type
-
10
- Availability
-
10
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Bohland, Jason W. (1)
-
Heyne, Matthias (1)
-
Malloy, Jessica R. (1)
-
Nistal, Dominic (1)
-
Tardif, Monique C. (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Ahmed, Khadija. (0)
-
& Akcil-Okan, O. (0)
-
& Akuom, D. (0)
-
& Aleven, V. (0)
-
& Andrews-Larson, C. (0)
-
& Archibald, J. (0)
-
& Attari, S. Z. (0)
-
& Ayala, O. (0)
-
& Babbitt, W. (0)
-
& Baek, Y. (0)
-
& Bahabry, Ahmed. (0)
-
& Bai, F. (0)
-
& Balasubramanian, R. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
:Chaosong Huang, Gang Lu (0)
-
A. Agarwal (0)
-
A. Beygelzimer (0)
-
A. E. Lischka (0)
-
A. E. Lischka, E. B. (0)
-
A. E. Lischka, E.B. Dyer (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Purpose: Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) interferes with speech output. DAF causes distorted and disfluent productions and errors in the serial order of produced sounds. Although DAF has been studied extensively, the specific patterns of elicited speech errors are somewhat obscured by relatively small speech samples, differences across studies, and uncontrolled variables. The goal of this study was to characterize the types of serial order errors that increase under DAF in a systematic syllable sequence production task, which used a closed set of sounds and controlled for speech rate. Method: Sixteen adult speakers repeatedly produced CVCVCV (C = consonant, V = vowel) sequences, paced to a “visual metronome,” while hearing self-generated feedback with delays of 0–250 ms. Listeners transcribed recordings, and speech errors were classified based on the literature surrounding naturally occurring slips of the tongue. A series of mixed-effects models were used to assess the effects of delay for different error types, for error arrival time, and for speaking rate. Results: DAF had a significant effect on the overall error rate for delays of 100 ms or greater. Statistical models revealed significant effects (relative to zero delay) for vowel and syllable repetitions, vowel exchanges, vowel omissions, onset disfluencies, and distortions.more »