- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources1
- Resource Type
-
0001000000000000
- More
- Availability
-
01
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Das, S (1)
-
Douglas, K_A (1)
-
Dyehouse, M (1)
-
Geddis, D (1)
-
Hill, S_D (1)
-
Jiang, B (1)
-
Kim, H (1)
-
Naeemi, A (1)
-
Nare, O (1)
-
Parvin, N (1)
-
Vasileska, D (1)
-
Villa, B (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
#Willis, Ciara (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& *Soto, E. (0)
-
& Abramson, C. I. (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Adams, S.G. (0)
-
& Ahmed, K. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
&, John Wiley (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
This empirical work-in-progress paper examines the impact of two technology-enhanced learning tools, an interactive visualization with multiple representations and explicit scaffolding and a simulation tool with single representation and implicit scaffolding, on students’ conceptual understanding and affective outcomes in semiconductor physics. This domain is known for early conceptual difficulty that often limits student progression into advanced coursework and the semiconductor workforce. Using a crossover design, 20 undergraduate electrical engineering students engaged with both tools and completed pre and post-assessments of conceptual knowledge, perceived understanding, interest, and motivation. A semi-structured focus group was analyzed using thematic analysis to capture students’ learning experiences. The findings reveal that while both tools supported students' cognitive and affective processes, one primarily fostered foundational understanding for novice learners, whereas the other one enabled deeper exploration for more experienced students. Although limited by sample size and short duration, the results suggest that aligning tool design with learners’ developmental stage may support both learning and motivation. Overall, this study demonstrates how instructional design features shape students’ engagement with complex engineering content and underscores the importance of adaptive technology-enhanced learning environments.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available June 21, 2027
An official website of the United States government
