Search for: All records

We performed exhaustive torsion sampling on more than 3 million compounds using the GFN2-xTB method and performed a comparison of experimental crystallographic and gas-phase conformers. Many conformer sampling methods derive torsional angle distributions from experimental crystallographic data, limiting the torsion preferences to molecules that must be stable, synthetically accessible, and able to be crystallized. In this work, we evaluate the differences in torsional preferences of experimental crystallographic geometries and gas-phase computed conformers from a broad selection of compounds to determine whether torsional angle distributions obtained from semiempirical methods are suitable priors for conformer sampling. We find that differences in torsion preferences can be mostly attributed to a lack of available experimental crystallographic data with small deviations derived from gas-phase geometry differences. GFN2 demonstrates the ability to provide accurate and reliable torsional preferences that can provide a basis for new methods free from the limitations of experimental data collection. We provide Gaussian-based fits and sampling distributions suitable for torsion sampling and propose an alternative to the widely used “experimental torsion and knowledge distance geometry” (ETKDG) method using quantum torsion-derived distance geometry (QTDG) methods. 

Conformer generation, the assignment of realistic 3D coordinates to a small molecule, is fundamental to structure-based drug design. Conformational ensembles are required for rigid-body matching algorithms, such as shape-based or pharmacophore approaches, and even methods that treat the ligand flexibly, such as docking, are dependent on the quality of the provided conformations due to not sampling all degrees of freedom (e.g., only sampling torsions). Here, we empirically elucidate some general principles about the size, diversity, and quality of the conformational ensembles needed to get the best performance in common structure-based drug discovery tasks. In many cases, our findings may parallel “common knowledge” well-known to practitioners of the field. Nonetheless, we feel that it is valuable to quantify these conformational effects while reproducing and expanding upon previous studies. Specifically, we investigate the performance of a state-of-the-art generative deep learning approach versus a more classical geometry-based approach, the effect of energy minimization as a postprocessing step, the effect of ensemble size (maximum number of conformers), and construction (filtering by root-mean-square deviation for diversity) and how these choices influence the ability to recapitulate bioactive conformations and perform pharmacophore screening and molecular docking. 

A key challenge in conformer sampling is finding low-energy conformations with a small number of energy evaluations. We recently demonstrated the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) is an effective method for finding the lowest energy conformation of a small molecule. Our approach balances between exploitation and exploration, and is more efficient than exhaustive or random search methods. Here, we extend strategies used on proteins and oligopeptides ( e.g. Ramachandran plots of secondary structure) and study correlated torsions in small molecules. We use bivariate von Mises distributions to capture correlations, and use them to constrain the search space. We validate the performance of our new method, Bayesian Optimization with Knowledge-based Expected Improvement (BOKEI), on a dataset consisting of 533 diverse small molecules, using (i) a force field (MMFF94); and (ii) a semi-empirical method (GFN2), as the objective function. We compare the search performance of BOKEI, BOA with Expected Improvement (BOA-EI), and a genetic algorithm (GA), using a fixed number of energy evaluations. In more than 60% of the cases examined, BOKEI finds lower energy conformations than global optimization with BOA-EI or GA. More importantly, we find correlated torsions in up to 15% of small molecules in larger data sets, up to 8 times more often than previously reported. The BOKEI patterns not only describe steric clashes, but also reflect favorable intramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking. Increasing our understanding of the conformational preferences of molecules will help improve our ability to find low energy conformers efficiently, which will have impact in a wide range of computational modeling applications.