Search for: All records

Abstract We present the analysis of a microlensing event KMT-2022-BLG-0086 of which the overall light curve is not described by a binary-lens single-source (2L1S) model, which suggests the existence of an extra lens or an extra source. We found that the event is best explained by the binary-lens binary-source (2L2S) model, but the 2L2S model is only favored over the triple-lens single-source (3L1S) model by Δχ² ≃ 9. Although the event has noticeable anomalies around the peak of the light curve, they are not enough covered to constrain the angular Einstein radiusθ_E, thus we only measure the minimum angular Einstein radius ${\theta }_{\mathrm{E},\min }$. From the Bayesian analysis, it is found that that the binary lens system is a binary star with masses of $(m_1,m_2)=(0.46_{-0.25}^{+0.35}{M}_{\odot },0.75_{-0.55}^{+0.67}{M}_{\odot })$at a distance of $D_{\mathrm{L}}=5.87_{-1.79}^{+1.21}$kpc, while the triple lens system is a brown dwarf or a massive giant planet in a low-mass binary-star system with masses of $(m_1,m_2,m_3)=(0.43_{-0.35}^{+0.41}{M}_{\odot },0.056_{-0.047}^{+0.055}{M}_{\odot }$, $20.84_{-17.04}^{+20.20}{M}_{\mathrm{J}})$at a distance of $D_{\mathrm{L}}=4.06_{-3.28}^{+1.39}$kpc, indicating a disk lens system. The 2L2S model yields the relative lens-source proper motion ofμ_rel ≥ 4.6 mas yr⁻¹that is consistent with the Bayesian result, whereas the 3L1S model yieldsμ_rel ≥ 18.9 mas yr⁻¹, which is more than three times larger than that of a typical disk object of ∼6 mas yr⁻¹and thus is not consistent with the Bayesian result. This suggests that the event is likely caused by the binary-lens binary-source model. 

Aims. The light curves of the microlensing events MOA-2022-BLG-091 and KMT-2024-BLG-1209 exhibit anomalies with very similar features. These anomalies appear near the peaks of the light curves, where the magnifications are moderately high, and are distinguished by weak caustic-crossing features with minimal distortion while the source remains inside the caustic. To achieve a deeper understanding of these anomalies, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the lensing events. Methods. We carried out binary-lens modeling with a thorough exploration of the parameter space. This analysis revealed that the anomalies in both events are of planetary origin, although their exact interpretation is complicated by different types of degeneracy. In the case of MOA-2022-BLG-091, the main difficulty in the interpretation of the anomaly arises from a newly identified degeneracy related to the uncertain angle at which the source trajectory intersects the planet–host axis. For KMT-2024-BLG-1209, the interpretation is affected by the previously known inner-outer degeneracy, which leads to ambiguity between solutions in which the source passes through either the inner or outer caustic region relative to the planet host. Results. Bayesian analysis indicates that the planets in both lens systems are giant planets with masses about two to four times that of Jupiter, orbiting early K-type main-sequence stars. Both systems are likely located in the Galactic disk at a distance of around 4 kiloparsecs. The degeneracy in KMT-2024-BLG-1209 is challenging to resolve because it stems from intrinsic similarities in the caustic structures of the degenerate solutions. In contrast, the degeneracy in MOA-2022-BLG-091, which occurs by chance rather than from inherent characteristics, is expected to be resolved by the future space based Roman RGES microlensing survey. 

Abstract In this work, we continue to apply the updated KMTNet tender-love care photometric pipeline to historical microlensing events. We apply the pipeline to a subsample of events from the KMTNet database, which we refer to as the giant source sample. Leveraging the improved photometric data, we conduct a systematic search for anomalies within this sample. The search successfully uncovers four new planet-like anomalies and recovers two previously known planetary signals. After detailed analysis, two of the newly discovered anomalies are confirmed as clear planets: KMT-2019-BLG-0578 and KMT-2021-BLG-0736. Their planet-to-host mass ratios areq ∼ 4 × 10⁻³andq ∼ 1 × 10⁻⁴, respectively. Another event, OGLE-2018-BLG-0421 (KMT-2018-BLG-0831), remains ambiguous. Both a stellar companion and a giant planet in the lens system could potentially explain the observed anomaly. The anomaly signal of the last event, MOA-2022-BLG-038 (KMT-2022-BLG-2342), is attributed to an extra source star. Within this sample, our procedure doubles the number of confirmed planets, demonstrating a significant enhancement in the survey sensitivity. 

Aims.The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) microlensing survey was conducted over four years, from 2016 to 2019, with the goal of serving as a precursor to future near-infrared microlensing surveys. Focusing on stars in the Galactic center and utilizing near-infrared passbands, the survey identified approximately one thousand microlensing events, 27 of which displayed anomalies in their light curves. This paper presents an analysis of these anomalous events, aiming to uncover the underlying causes of the observed anomalies. Methods.The events were analyzed under various configurations, considering the potential binarity of both the lens and the source. For 11 events that were additionally observed by other optical microlensing surveys, including those conducted by the OGLE, KMTNet, and MOA collaborations, we incorporated their data into our analysis. Results.Among the reported anomalous events, we revealed the nature of 24 events except for three events, in which one was likely to be a transient variable, and two were difficult to accurately characterize their nature due to the limitations of the available data. We confirmed the binary lens nature of the anomalies in 22 events. Among these, we verified the earlier discovery that the companion in the binary lens system UKIRT11L is a planetary object. Accurately describing the anomaly in UKIRT21 required a model that accounted for the binarity of both the lens and the source. For two events UKIRT01 and UKIRT17, the anomalies could be interpreted using either a binary-source or a binary-lens model. For the UKIRT05, it was found that accounting for higher-order effects induced by the orbit al motions of both Earth and the binary lens was crucial. With the measured microlensing parallax togeter with the angular Einstein radius, the component masses of the UKIRT05 binary lens were determined to beM₁= (1.05 ± 0.20)M_⊙,M₂= (0.36 ± 0.07)M_⊙, and the distance to the lens was found to beD_L= (3.11 ± 0.40) kpc. 

Abstract In the pursuit of understanding the population of stellar remnants within the Milky Way, we analyze the sample of ∼950 microlensing events observed by the Spitzer Space Telescope between 2014 and 2019. In this study we focus on a subsample of nine microlensing events, selected based on their long timescales, small microlensing parallaxes, and joint observations by the Gaia mission, to increase the probability that the chosen lenses are massive and the mass is measurable. Among the selected events we identify lensing black holes and neutron star candidates, with potential confirmation through forthcoming release of the Gaia time-series astrometry in 2026. Utilizing Bayesian analysis and Galactic models, along with the Gaia Data Release 3 proper-motion data, four good candidates for dark remnants were identified: OGLE-2016-BLG-0293, OGLE-2018-BLG-0483, OGLE-2018-BLG-0662, and OGLE-2015-BLG-0149, with lens masses of ${3.0}_{-1.3}^{+1.8}{M}_{\odot }$, ${4.7}_{-2.1}^{+3.2}{M}_{\odot }$, ${3.15}_{-0.64}^{+0.66}{M}_{\odot }$and ${1.40}_{-0.55}^{+0.75}{M}_{\odot }$, respectively. Notably, the first two candidates are expected to exhibit astrometric microlensing signals detectable by Gaia, offering the prospect of validating the lens masses. The methodologies developed in this work will be applied to the full Spitzer microlensing sample, populating and analyzing the timescale (t_E) versus parallax (π_E) diagram to derive constraints on the population of lenses in general and massive remnants in particular. 

Aims.We investigated the nature of the anomalies appearing in four microlensing events KMT-2020-BLG-0757, KMT-2022-BLG-0732, KMT-2022-BLG-1787, and KMT-2022-BLG-1852. The light curves of these events commonly exhibit initial bumps followed by subsequent troughs that extend across a substantial portion of the light curves. Methods.We performed thorough modeling of the anomalies to elucidate their characteristics. Despite their prolonged durations, which differ from the usual brief anomalies observed in typical planetary events, our analysis revealed that each anomaly in these events originated from a planetary companion located within the Einstein ring of the primary star. It was found that the initial bump arouse when the source star crossed one of the planetary caustics, while the subsequent trough feature occurred as the source traversed the region of minor image perturbations lying between the pair of planetary caustics. Results.The estimated masses of the host and planet, their mass ratios, and the distance to the discovered planetary systems are (M_host/M_⊙,M_planet/M_J,q/10⁻³,D_L/kpc) = (0.58_−0.30^+0.33, 10.71_−5.61^+6.17, 17.61 ± 2.25, 6.67_−1.30^+0.93) for KMT-2020-BLG-0757, (0.53_−0.31^+0.31, 1.12_−0.65^+0.65, 2.01 ± 0.07, 6.66_−1.84^+1.19) for KMT-2022-BLG-0732, (0.42_−0.23^+0.32, 6.64_−3.64^+4.98, 15.07 ± 0.86, 7.55_−1.30^+0.89) for KMT-2022-BLG-1787, and (0.32_−0.19^+0.34, 4.98_−2.94^+5.42, 8.74 ± 0.49, 6.27_−1.15^+0.90) for KMT-2022-BLG-1852. These parameters indicate that all the planets are giants with masses exceeding the mass of Jupiter in our solar system and the hosts are low-mass stars with masses substantially less massive than the Sun. 

Aims.We aim to investigate the nature of the short-term anomaly that appears in the lensing light curve of KMT-2023-BLG-1866. The anomaly was only partly covered due to its short duration of less than a day, coupled with cloudy weather conditions and a restricted nighttime duration. Methods.Considering the intricacy of interpreting partially covered signals, we thoroughly explored all potential degenerate solutions. Through this process, we identified three planetary scenarios that account for the observed anomaly equally well. These scenarios are characterized by the specific planetary parameters: (s, q)_inner= [0.9740 ± 0.0083, (2.46 ± 1.07) × 10⁻⁵], (s, q)_intermediate= [0.9779 ± 0.0017, (1.56 ± 0.25) × 10⁻⁵], and (s, q)_outer= [0.9894 ± 0.0107, (2.31 ± 1.29) × 10⁻⁵], wheresandqdenote the projected separation (scaled to the Einstein radius) and mass ratio between the planet and its host, respectively. We identify that the ambiguity between the inner and outer solutions stems from the inner-outer degeneracy, while the similarity between the intermediate solution and the others is due to an accidental degeneracy caused by incomplete anomaly coverage. Results.Through Bayesian analysis utilizing the constraints derived from measured lensing observables and blending flux, our estimation indicates that the lens system comprises a very-low-mass planet orbiting an early M-type star situated approximately (6.2–6.5) kpc from Earth in terms of median posterior values for the different solutions. The median mass of the planet host is in the range of (0.48–0.51)M_⊙, and that of the planet’s mass spans a range of (2.6–4.0)M_E, varying across different solutions. The detection of KMT-2023-BLG-1866Lb signifies the extension of the lensing surveys to very-low-mass planets that have been difficult to detect in earlier surveys. 

Aims.As a part of the project aiming to build a homogeneous sample of binary-lens (2L1S) events containing brown dwarf (BD) companions, we investigate the 2021 season microlensing data collected by the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet) survey. Methods.For this purpose, we first identified 2L1S events by conducting systematic analyses of anomalous lensing events. We then selected candidate BD companion events by applying the criterion that the mass ratio of the lens components is lower thanq_th ∼ 0.1. Results.From this procedure, we find four events including KMT-2021-BLG-0588, KMT-2021-BLG-1110, KMT-2021-BLG-1643, and KMT-2021-BLG-1770, for which the estimated mass ratios areq ∼ 0.10, 0.07, 0.08, and 0.15, respectively. Event KMT-2021-BLG-1770 was selected as a candidate even though the mass ratio is slightly greater thanq_thbecause the lens mass expected from the measured short timescale of the event,t_E ∼ 7.6 days, is low. From the Bayesian analyses, we estimate that the primary and companion masses are (M₁/M_⊙,M₂/M_⊙) = (0.54_−0.24^+0.31, 0.053_−0.023^+0.031) for KMT-2021-BLG-0588L, (0.74_−0.35^+0.27, 0.055_−0.026^+0.020) for KMT-2021-BLG-1110L, (0.73_−0.17^+0.24,0.061_−0.014^+0.020) for KMT-2021-BLG-1643L, and (0.13_−0.07^+0.18, 0.020_−0.011^+0.028) for KMT-2021-BLG-1770L. It is estimated that the probabilities that the lens companions are in the BD mass range are 82%, 85%, 91%, and 59% for the individual events. To confirm the BD nature of the lens companions found in this and previous works by directly imaging the lenses from future high-resolution adaptive-optics (AO) followup observations, we provide the lens-source separations expected in 2030, which is the approximate year of the first AO light on 30 m class telescopes. 

Aims.We investigate the previous microlensing data collected by the KMTNet survey in search of anomalous events for which no precise interpretations of the anomalies had been suggested. From this investigation, we find that the anomaly in the lensing light curve of the event KMT-2021-BLG-1547 is approximately described by a binary-lens (2L1S) model with a lens possessing a giant planet, but the model leaves unexplained residuals. Methods.We investigated the origin of the residuals by testing more sophisticated models that include either an extra lens component (3L1S model) or an extra source star (2L2S model) on top of the 2L1S configuration of the lens system. From these analyses, we find that the residuals from the 2L1S model originate from the existence of a faint companion to the source. The 2L2S solution substantially reduces the residuals and improves the model fit by Δχ²= 67.1 with respect to the 2L1S solution. The 3L1S solution also improves the fit, but its fit is worse than that of the 2L2S solution by Δχ²= 24.7. Results.According to the 2L2S solution, the lens of the event is a planetary system with planet and host masses (M_p/M_J,M_h/M_⊙) = (1.47_−0.77^+0.64, 0.72_−0.38^+0.32) lying at a distanceD_L= 5.07_−1.50^+0.98kpc, and the source is a binary composed of a subgiant primary of a lateGor an earlyKspectral type and a main-sequence companion of aKspectral type. The event demonstrates the need for sophisticated modeling of unexplained anomalies if one wants to construct a complete microlensing planet sample. 

Aims.We investigate the microlensing data collected in the 2022 season from high-cadence microlensing surveys in order to find weak signals produced by planetary companions to lenses. Methods.From these searches, we find that two lensing events, KMT-2022-BLG-0475 and KMT-2022-BLG-1480, exhibit weak short-term anomalies. From a detailed modeling of the lensing light curves, we determine that the anomalies are produced by planetary companions with a mass ratio to the primary ofq ~1.8 × 10⁻⁴for KMT-2022-BLG-0475L andq ~4.3 × 10⁻⁴for KMT-2022-BLG-1480L. Results.We estimate that the host and planet masses and the projected planet-host separation are (M_h/M_⊙,M_p/M_U,a_⊥/au) = (0.43_−0.23^+0.35, 1.73_−0.92^+1.42, 2.03_−0.38^+0.25) for KMT-2022-BLG-0475L and (0.18_−0.09^+0.16, 1.82_−0.92^+1.60, 1.22_−0.14^+0.15) for KMT-2022-BLG-1480L, whereM_Udenotes the mass of Uranus. The two planetary systems have some characteristics in common: the primaries of the lenses are early-mid M dwarfs that lie in the Galactic bulge, and the companions are ice giants that lie beyond the snow lines of the planetary systems.