Search for: All records

For many rare diseases with no approved preventive interventions, promising interventions exist. However, it has proven difficult to conduct a pivotal phase 3 trial that could provide direct evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect of the intervention on the target disease outcome. When a promising putative surrogate endpoint(s) for the target outcome is available, surrogate-based provisional approval of an intervention may be pursued. Following the general Causal Roadmap rubric, we describe a surrogate endpoint-based provisional approval causal roadmap. Based on an observational study data set and a phase 3 randomized trial data set, this roadmap defines an approach to analyze the combined data set to draw a conservative inference about the treatment effect (TE) on the target outcome in the phase 3 study population. The observational study enrolls untreated individuals and collects baseline covariates, surrogate endpoints, and the target outcome, and is used to estimate the surrogate index—the regression of the target outcome on the surrogate endpoints and baseline covariates. The phase 3 trial randomizes participants to treated vs. untreated and collects the same data but is much smaller and hence very underpowered to directly assess TE, such that inference on TE is based on the surrogate index. This inference is made conservative by specifying 2 bias functions: one that expresses an imperfection of the surrogate index as a surrogate endpoint in the phase 3 study, and the other that expresses imperfect transport of the surrogate index in the untreated from the observational to the phase 3 study. Plug-in and nonparametric efficient one-step estimators of TE, with inferential procedures, are developed. The finite-sample performance of the estimators is evaluated in simulation studies. The causal roadmap is motivated by and illustrated with contemporary Group B Streptococcus vaccine development. 

In the CYD14 trial of the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine in 2–14 year-olds, neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers to the vaccine-insert dengue strains correlated inversely with symptomatic, virologically-confirmed dengue (VCD). Also, vaccine efficacy against VCD was higher against dengue prM/E amino acid sequences closer to the vaccine inserts. We integrated the nAb and sequence data types by assessing nAb titers as a correlate of sequence-specific VCD separately in the vaccine arm and in the placebo arm. In both vaccine and placebo recipients the correlation of nAb titer with sequence-specific VCD was stronger for dengue nAb contact site sequences closer to the vaccine (p = 0.005 and p = 0.012, respectively). The risk of VCD in vaccine (placebo) recipients was 6.7- (1.80)-fold lower at the 90th vs 10th percentile of nAb for viruses perfectly matched to CYD-TDV, compared to 2.1- (0.78)-fold lower at the 90th vs 10th percentile for viruses with five amino acid mismatches. The evidence for a stronger sequence-distance dependent correlate of risk for the vaccine arm indicates departure from the Prentice criteria for a valid sequence-distance specific surrogate endpoint and suggests that the nAb marker may affect dengue risk differently depending on whether nAbs arise from infection or also by vaccination. However, when restricting to baselineseropositive 9–14 year-olds, the correlation pattern became more similar between the vaccine and placebo arms, supporting nAb titers as an approximate surrogate endpoint in this population. No sequencespecific nAb titer correlates of VCD were seen in baseline-seronegative participants. Integrated immune response/pathogen sequence data correlates analyses could help increase knowledge of correlates of risk and surrogate endpoints for other vaccines against genetically diverse pathogens.