Search for: All records

Abstract Significant advances have been made in the development of nanoparticles for cancer treatment in recent years. Despite promising results in preclinical animal models, cancer nanomedicines often fail in clinical trials. This failure rate could be reduced by defining stringent criteria for testing and quality control during the design and development stages, and by performing carefully planned preclinical studies in relevant animal models. This article discusses best practices for the evaluation of nanomedicines in murine tumor models. First, a recommended set of experiments to perform is introduced, including discussion of the types of data to collect during these studies. This is followed by an outline of various tumor models and their clinical relevance. Next, different routes of nanoparticle administration are overviewed, followed by a summary of important controls to include in in vivo studies of nanomedicine. Finally, animal welfare considerations are discussed, and an overview of the steps involved in achieving US Food and Drug Administration approval after animal studies are completed is provided. Researchers should use this report as a guideline for effective preclinical evaluation of cancer nanomedicine. As the community adopts best practices for in vivo testing, the rate of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines is likely to improve.