Search for: All records

Abstract Time-correlated high-speed video and electric field change data for 139 natural, negative cloud-to-ground (CG)-lightning flashes reveal 615 return strokes (RSs) and 29 upward-illumination (UI)-type strokes. Among 121 multi-stroke flashes, 56% visibly connected to more than one ground location for either a RS or UI-type stroke. The number of separate ground-stroke connection locations per CG flash averaged 1.74, with maximum 6. This study examines the 88 subsequent strokes that involved a subsequent stepped leader (SSL), either reaching ground or intercepting a former leader to ground, in 61 flashes. Two basic modes by which these SSLs begin are described and are termed dart - then - stepped leaders herein. One inception mode occurs when a dart leader deflects from the prior main channel and begins propagating as a stepped leader to ground. In these ‘divert’ mode cases, the relevant interstroke time from the prior RS in the channel to the SSL inception from that path is long, ranging from 105 to 204 ms in four visible cases. The alternative mode of SSL inception occurs when a dart leader reaches the end of a prior unsuccessful branch—of an earlier competing dart leader, stepped leader, or initial leader—then begins advancing as a stepped leader toward ground. In this more common ‘branch’ mode (85% of visible cases), there may be no portion of the subsequent RS channel that is shared with a prior RS channel. These two inception modes, and variations among them, can occur in different subsequent strokes of the same flash. 

High‐speed video and electric field change data are used to describe the first 5 ms of a negative cloud‐to‐ground flash. These observations reveal an evolution in character of the luminosity and electric field change pulses as two branches of the leader separately transition from initial leader to propagating as a negative stepped leader (SL). For the first time reported, there is evidence of weak luminosity coincident with the initiating event, a weak bipolar pulse 60 μs prior to the first initial breakdown (IB) pulse. During the IB stage, the initial leader advances intermittently at intervals of 100–280 μs, in separate light bursts that are bright for a few 20‐μs frames and are time coincident with IB pulses. In the intervals between IB pulses, the initial leader is dim or invisible during the earliest 1.8 ms. Within 2 ms, the leader propagation begins transitioning to an early SL phase, in which the leader tip advances at more regular intervals of 40–80 μs during relatively dim and brief steps which are coincident with SL pulses having short duration, small amplitude, and typically unipolar waveform. These data indicate that when the entire initial leader length behind the lower end begins to remain illuminated between bursts, the propagation mode changes from IB bursts to SL steps, and the IB stage ends. The results support a hypothesis that the early initial leader development occurs in the absence of a continuously hot channel, thus the initial leader propagation is physically unlike the self‐propagating SL advance.

 

The properties of the first 5–12 classic initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) of three cloud‐to‐ground (CG) lightning flashes were determined using a modified transmission line model. As part of the modeling, the current with respect to time of each IBP was determined from the measured electric field changes at multiple sites using three theoretical methods called Hilbert transform, Hertzian dipole, and matrix inversion. In the transmission line modeling the length of each IBP was estimated from high‐speed video data of the IBPs. The modeling provided the following properties of the larger classic IBPs in each flash: peak current, velocity, total charge, charge moment, radiated power, and total energy dissipated for successive IB pulses in three developing lightning flashes. For the main initial leader channel in the three CG flashes (and for one long branch), IBP peak current was largest for the first or second classic IBP and declined mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. For the same channels, IBP current velocity was smallest for the first classic IBP and increased mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. The smallest velocities were (2.0, 2.5, 2.5, 3.0) × 10⁷m/s, respectively, while the largest velocities were (9.2, 12.2, 11.5, 12.0) × 10⁷m/s, respectively. These data support earlier hypotheses that it is the classic IB pulses during initial leader of normal negative CG flashes that change the nonconductive air into an ionized path that is sufficiently long and conductive to start the stepped leader.

 

This study describes a new method for modeling the radiated electric field (E) of initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) of lightning flashes. Similar to some previous models, it is assumed thatEpulses are caused by a current propagating along a vertical path, and an equation based on Maxwell's equations is used to determineEdue to the current. A matrix inversion technique is used with the IBP radiation term ofEto determine the IBP current waveform directly from far‐fieldEmeasurements rather than assuming a parameterized current waveform and searching for appropriate parameters. This technique is developed and applied to observations of six previously modeled IBPs. Compared to the prior modeling, this matrix inversion method gives significantly better results, based on calculated IBP goodness of fit to the originalEdata. In addition, this model can match IBP subpulses along with representing the overall bipolar IBP waveform. This method should be useful for studying IBPs because once the IBP current is known, one can calculate other physical parameters of IBPs, such as charge moment change, total charge moved, and total power radiated. Thus, the more realistic IBP current waveform determined by this technique may offer new clues about the physical mechanism causing IBPs.