skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Keating, Addie R."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Rationale

    Simple, affordable, and rapid methods for identifying the molecular weight (MW) distribution and macromolecular composition of polymeric materials are limited. Current tools require extensive solvent consumption, linear calibrations, and expensive consumables. A simple method for the determination of average MW (Mn,Mw) and chain end groups is demonstrated for synthetic homopolymer standards using direct injection electrospray ionization‐mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS) and an open‐sourced charge deconvolution (CDC) algorithm.

    Methods

    Five homopolymer standards in the 1–7 kDa MW range were analyzed using direct‐injection ESI‐MS on a quadrupole/time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer. The samples investigated, viz. two poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and two poly(styrene sulfonic acid) (PSS) standards with narrow polydispersity and one poly(d,l‐alanine) (pAla) standard with undefined polydispersity, were chosen to illustrate challenges with ESI‐MS quantitation. Using the UniDec program, weight average MWs (Mw) obtained from the charge‐deconvoluted spectra were compared to the reportedMwdata of the standards from size exclusion chromatography (SEC) measurements.

    Results

    The MW data derived for the PSS, PEO, and pAla standards agreed well with the corresponding reportedMwor MW range values. The method was able to provide MW, degree of polymerization (DP), and polydispersity index (PDI) information for polymers with narrow (PSS, PEO) as well as broader (pAla) molecular weight distribution; this feature provides an advantage over MW analysis via matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) for ESI‐compatible materials. PSS standards differing in average MW by only a few repeat units could be confidently distinguished. Additionally, the oligomeric resolution observed for all samples studied unveiled chain‐end information not available through chromatographic analysis.

    Conclusions

    Overall, the free and easy‐to‐use UniDec CDC algorithm provides a simple, alternative method to measuring MW and DP for polymeric materials without high solvent consumption, expensive ionization sources, or calibration curves. Information about the masses of individual oligomers and the possibility to further characterize these oligomers using tandem mass spectrometry and/or ion mobility techniques constitutes additional benefits of this approach vis‐à‐vis traditional MW and PDI elucidation through SEC.

     
    more » « less