Search for: All records

This study was designed to investigate the impact of heat stress on the physiological changes and mortality rates of different life stages of the rhizostome jellyfish species Cassiopea xamachana, including planula larvae, scyphistomae (polyps), and medusae. Both larval and scyphistoma stages of C. xamachana are relatively tolerant to high temperatures, but both experience nearly 100% mortality at 36 °C. Increasing temperatures also induced stage-specific effects. Settlement rates of artificially induced larvae were near 100% at lower temperatures but decreased at 34–36 °C; larvae were dead at 36 °C. When scyphistomae of C. xamachana were subjected to a gradual increase in temperature from 28 to 38 °C, polyp size declined steadily in starved animals, with animals showing clear signs of temperature stress between 35 and 36 °C. Small medusae of C. xamachana pulsed more than larger medusae and tended to have peak pulse rates at higher temperatures (~35 °C) compared to larger medusae (~29–33 °C), though the latter was not significant. At a temperature of 39 °C, all the medusae exhibited signs of heat stress, including pulsing erratically (generally lower) rather than steady rhythmic pulsations, releasing copious amounts of mucus, and having withdrawn oral arms. Temperature data presented here, and in the literature, show that pulsing C. xamachana medusae exhibit a bell-shaped curve, with temperatures over 38 °C being detrimental and becoming lethal at 40 °C. Based on the findings of this study, it is proposed that the medusa stage of C. xamachana has a higher tolerance for elevated temperatures compared to both the larvae and the polyps. Predictions of global climate change indicate that populations of C. xamachana will likely face longer and hotter summer periods, leading to increased population sizes. However, higher temperatures pose a greater risk to the survival of the species as they increase mortality in the polyp and larval stages compared to the medusa stage. 

Abstract Corals have complex symbiotic associations that can be influenced by the environment. We compare symbiotic dinoflagellate (family: Symbiodiniaceae) associations and the microbiome of five scleractinian coral species from three different reef habitats in Palau, Micronesia. Although pH and temperature corresponded with specific host‐Symbiodiniaceae associations common to the nearshore and offshore habitats, bacterial community dissimilarity analyses indicated minimal influence of these factors on microbial community membership for the coralsCoelastrea aspera,Psammocora digitata, andPachyseris rugosa. However, coral colonies sampled close to human development exhibited greater differences in microbial community diversity compared to the nearshore habitat for the coral speciesCoelastrea aspera,Montipora foliosa, andPocillopora acuta, and the offshore habitat forCoelastrea aspera, while also showing less consistency in Symbiodiniaceae associations. These findings indicate the influence that habitat location has on the bacterial and Symbiodiniaceae communities comprising the coral holobiont and provide important considerations for the conservation of coral reef communities, especially for island nations with increasing human populations and development. 

Abstract Coral reefs are declining worldwide, yet some coral populations are better adapted to withstand reductions in pH and the rising frequency of marine heatwaves. The nearshore reef habitats of Palau, Micronesia are a proxy for a future of warmer, more acidic oceans. Coral populations in these habitats can resist, and recover from, episodes of thermal stress better than offshore conspecifics. To explore the physiological basis of this tolerance, we compared tissue biomass (ash-free dry weight cm −2 ), energy reserves (i.e., protein, total lipid, carbohydrate content), and several important lipid classes in six coral species living in both offshore and nearshore environments. In contrast to expectations, a trend emerged of many nearshore colonies exhibiting lower biomass and energy reserves than colonies from offshore sites, which may be explained by the increased metabolic demand of living in a warmer, acidic, environment. Despite hosting different dinoflagellate symbiont species and having access to contrasting prey abundances, total lipid and lipid class compositions were similar in colonies from each habitat. Ultimately, while the regulation of colony biomass and energy reserves may be influenced by factors, including the identity of the resident symbiont, kind of food consumed, and host genetic attributes, these independent processes converged to a similar homeostatic set point under different environmental conditions. 

Symbiotic mutualisms are essential to ecosystems and numerous species across the tree of life. For reef-building corals, the benefits of their association with endosymbiotic dinoflagellates differ within and across taxa, and nutrient exchange between these partners is influenced by environmental conditions. Furthermore, it is widely assumed that corals associated with symbionts in the genusDurusdiniumtolerate high thermal stress at the expense of lower nutrient exchange to support coral growth. We traced both inorganic carbon (H¹³CO₃^–) and nitrate (¹⁵NO₃^–) uptake by divergent symbiont species and quantified nutrient transfer to the host coral under normal temperatures as well as in colonies exposed to high thermal stress. Colonies representative of diverse coral taxa associated withDurusdinium trenchiiorCladocopiumspp. exhibited similar nutrient exchange under ambient conditions. By contrast, heat-exposed colonies withD. trenchiiexperienced less physiological stress than conspecifics withCladocopiumspp. while high carbon assimilation and nutrient transfer to the host was maintained. This discovery differs from the prevailing notion that these mutualisms inevitably suffer trade-offs in physiological performance. These findings emphasize that many host–symbiont combinations adapted to high-temperature equatorial environments are high-functioning mutualisms; and why their increased prevalence is likely to be important to the future productivity and stability of coral reef ecosystems. 

Abstract The iconic and threatened Caribbean coral,Acropora palmata, is an essential reef-ecosystem engineer. Understanding the processes underpinning this coral’s survival and growth is essential to restoring this foundational species. Here, we compared replicateA. palmatacolonies transplanted along 350 km of Florida’s offshore coral reef to determine holobiont and/or environmental variables that predict transplant success. We found a west-to-east gradient in coral physiology coupled with site-specific coral-associated microbiomes. Interestingly, no variables were linked to coral genet. Our results suggest that the unique oceanographic conditions with periodic upwelling events in the Dry Tortugas provide corals with greater opportunity for heterotrophy that in turn enhances coral growth and survivorship, and positively influences the microbiome. Our findings indicate that restoration efforts in the Dry Tortugas, and other places exhibiting higher food availability, could be most effective forA. palmata. 

Within microeukaryotes, genetic variation and functional variation sometimes accumulate more quickly than morphological differences. To understand the evolutionary history and ecology of such lineages, it is key to examine diversity at multiple levels of organization. In the dinoflagellate family Symbiodiniaceae, which can form endosymbioses with cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea anemones, jellyfish), other marine invertebrates (e.g., sponges, molluscs, flatworms), and protists (e.g., foraminifera), molecular data have been used extensively over the past three decades to describe phenotypes and to make evolutionary and ecological inferences. Despite advances in Symbiodiniaceae genomics, a lack of consensus among researchers with respect to interpreting genetic data has slowed progress in the field and acted as a barrier to reconciling observations. Here, we identify key challenges regarding the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae genetic diversity across three levels: species, populations, and communities. We summarize areas of agreement and highlight techniques and approaches that are broadly accepted. In areas where debate remains, we identify unresolved issues and discuss technologies and approaches that can help to fill knowledge gaps related to genetic and phenotypic diversity. We also discuss ways to stimulate progress, in particular by fostering a more inclusive and collaborative research community. We hope that this perspective will inspire and accelerate coral reef science by serving as a resource to those designing experiments, publishing research, and applying for funding related to Symbiodiniaceae and their symbiotic partnerships.