Search for: All records

High refractive index dielectrics enable nanoscale integration of optical components with practically no absorption loss. Hence, high index dielectrics are promising for many emerging applications in nanophotonics. However, the lack of a complete library of high index dielectric materials poses a significant challenge to understanding the full potential for dielectric nanophotonics. Currently, it is assumed that the absorption edge and the sub‐bandgap refractive index of a semiconductor exhibit a rigid trade‐off, popularly known as the Moss rule. Thus, the Moss rule appears to set an upper limit on the refractive index of a dielectric for a given operating wavelength. However, there are many dielectric materials that surpass the Moss rule, referred to here as super‐Mossian dielectrics. Here, the general features of super‐Mossian dielectrics and their physical origin are discussed to facilitate the search for high index dielectrics. As an example, iron pyrite, an outstanding super‐Mossian material with index nearly 40% higher than the Moss rule prediction, is developed. The local dielectric resonances in iron pyrite nanoresonators are experimentally observed, and the impact of super‐Mossian materials on nanophotonics is demonstrated.

As lasers get more and more miniaturized and their dimensions become comparable to the wavelength, two interconnected phenomena take place: the fraction of spontaneous radiation going into a specific laser mode (β‐factor) increases and can ultimately reach unity, while the radiative lifetime gets shortened by the Purcell factorF_p. Often it is assumed that an increase of these two factors, along with the quality factor (Q‐factor), almost invariably causes reduction of the lasing threshold. This assumption is tested on various photonic and plasmonic lasers, demonstrating that, while there is obvious correlation between the aforementioned factors and the laser threshold, the dependence is far from being straightforward and omnipresent. Depending on specific laser material and geometry, the threshold can decrease, increase, or stay unchanged whenβ‐factor,Q‐factor, andF_pincrease. For the most part, the reduction of threshold is achieved simply by reducing the laser volume and this volume reduction can concurrently cause the increase inβ‐factor and/or Purcell factor, but it would be imprudent to say that the increase in either of these factors is the cause of the threshold reduction.