Search for: All records

Communities are a common and widely studied structure in networks, typically assum- ing that the network is fully and correctly observed. In practice, network data are often collected by querying nodes about their connections. In some settings, all edges of a sam- pled node will be recorded, and in others, a node may be asked to name its connections. These sampling mechanisms introduce noise and bias, which can obscure the community structure and invalidate assumptions underlying standard community detection methods. We propose a general model for a class of network sampling mechanisms based on recording edges via querying nodes, designed to improve community detection for network data col- lected in this fashion. We model edge sampling probabilities as a function of both individual preferences and community parameters, and show community detection can be performed by spectral clustering under this general class of models. We also propose, as a special case of the general framework, a parametric model for directed networks we call the nomination stochastic block model, which allows for meaningful parameter interpretations and can be fitted by the method of moments. In this case, spectral clustering and the method of mo- ments are computationally ecient and come with theoretical guarantees of consistency. We evaluate the proposed model in simulation studies on unweighted and weighted net- works and under misspecified models. The method is applied to a faculty hiring dataset, discovering a meaningful hierarchy of communities among US business schools. 

Functional connections in the brain are frequently represented by weighted networks, with nodes representing locations in the brain and edges representing the strength of connectivity between these locations. One challenge in analyzing such data is that inference at the individual edge level is not particularly biologically meaningful; interpretation is more useful at the level of so-called functional systems or groups of nodes and connections between them; this is often called “graph-aware” inference in the neuroimaging literature. However, pooling over functional regions leads to significant loss of information and lower accuracy. Another challenge is correlation among edge weights within a subject which makes inference based on independence assumptions unreliable. We address both of these challenges with a linear mixed effects model, which accounts for functional systems and for edge dependence, while still modeling individual edge weights to avoid loss of information. The model allows for comparing two populations, such as patients and healthy controls, both at the functional regions level and at individual edge level, leading to biologically meaningful interpretations. We fit this model to resting state fMRI data on schizophrenic patients and healthy controls, obtaining interpretable results consistent with the schizophrenia literature.