Search for: All records

Effective human-AI collaboration requires agents to adopt their roles and levels of support based on human needs, task requirements, and complexity. Traditional human-AI teaming often relies on a pre-determined robot communication scheme, restricting teamwork adaptability in complex tasks. Leveraging the strong communication capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we propose a Human-Robot Teaming Framework with Multi-Modal Language feedback (HRT-ML), a framework designed to enhance human-robot interaction by adjusting the frequency and content of language-based feedback. The HRT-ML framework includes two core modules: a Coordinator for high-level, low-frequency strategic guidance and a Manager for task-specific, high-frequency instructions, enabling passive and active interactions with human teammates. To assess the impact of language feedback in collaborative scenarios, we conducted experiments in an enhanced Overcooked-AI game environment with varying levels of task complexity (easy, medium, hard) and feedback frequency (inactive, passive, active, superactive). Our results show that as task complexity increases relative to human capabilities, human teammates exhibited stronger preferences toward robotic agents that can offer frequent, proactive support. However, when task complexities exceed the LLM's capacity, noisy and inaccurate feedback from superactive agents can instead hinder team performance, as it requires human teammates to increase their effort to interpret and respond to the large amount of communications, with limited performance return. Our results offer a general principle for robotic agents to dynamically adjust their levels and frequencies of communication to work seamlessly with humans and achieve improved teaming performance. 

Truly collaborative scientific field data collection between human scientists and autonomous robot systems requires a shared understanding of the search objectives and tradeoffs faced when making decisions. Therefore, critical to developing intelligent robots to aid human experts is an understanding of how scientists make such decisions and how they adapt their data collection strategies when presented with new informationin situ. In this study, we examined the dynamic data collection decisions of 108 expert geoscience researchers using a simulated field scenario. Human data collection behaviors suggested two distinct objectives: an information-based objective to maximize information coverage and a discrepancy-based objective to maximize hypothesis verification. We developed a highly simplified quantitative decision model that allows the robot to predict potential human data collection locations based on the two observed human data collection objectives. Predictions from the simple model revealed a transition from information-based to discrepancy-based objective as the level of information increased. The findings will allow robotic teammates to connect experts’ dynamic science objectives with the adaptation of their sampling behaviors and, in the long term, enable the development of more cognitively compatible robotic field assistants.