Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract We have published a recent paper on differences between temperature fluctuations of various vertical scales in raw and processed U.S. high vertical resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD). In that paper, we note that the small-scale temperature fluctuations in the raw U.S. HVRRD are significantly larger than those in the processed U.S. HVRRD and that those small-scale temperature fluctuations are much larger during daytime that during nighttime. We believe that this is due to the varying amount of solar radiation falling on the radiosonde temperature sensor as the radiosonde instrument swings and rotates. In light of these new results, we present revisions to some of our conclusions about the climatology of atmospheric unstable layers. When we repeat our calculations of atmospheric unstable layers using the processed U.S. HVRRD, we find the following. 1) The 0000/1200 UTC differences in unstable layer occurrences in the lower stratosphere that were noted in our earlier paper essentially disappear. 2) The “notch” in the deep tropics where there is a relative deficiency of thin unstable layers and a corresponding excess of thicker layers is still a feature when processed data are analyzed, but the daytime notch is less marked when the processed data were used. 3) The discontinuity in unstable layer occurrences, when there was a change in radiosonde instrumentation, is still present when processed data are analyzed, but is diminished from what it was when the raw data were analyzed. Significance StatementIn a previous paper deriving the climatology of atmospheric unstable layers, we emphasized several findings. We reexamine three of the main points of that paper when processed U.S. high vertical resolution radiosonde data are analyzed instead of the raw data used in that previous paper. We find the 0000/1200 UTC differences virtually disappear in the new analysis. We find that the “notch” feature previously noted at Koror still exists, and we find that the discontinuity in unstable layers, when radiosonde instrumentation is changed, is diminished, but is still present in the new analysis.more » « less
-
Abstract The 1-s-resolution U.S. radiosonde data are analyzed for unstable layers, where the potential temperature decreases with increasing altitude, in the troposphere and lower stratosphere (LS). Care is taken to exclude spurious unstable layers arising from noise in the soundings and also to allow for the destabilizing influence of water vapor in saturated layers. Riverton, Wyoming, and Greensboro, North Carolina, in the extratropics, are analyzed in detail, where it is found that the annual and diurnal variations are largest, and the interannual variations are smallest in the LS. More unstable layer occurrences in the LS at Riverton are found at 0000 UTC, while at Greensboro, more unstable layer occurrences in the LS are at 1200 UTC, consistent with a geographical pattern where greater unstable layer occurrences in the LS are at 0000 UTC in the western United States, while greater unstable layer occurrences are at 1200 UTC in the eastern United States. The picture at Koror, Palau, in the tropics is different in that the diurnal and interannual variations in unstable layer occurrences in the LS are largest, with much smaller annual variations. At Koror, more frequent unstable layer occurrences in the LS occur at 0000 UTC. Also, a “notch” in the frequencies of occurrence of thin unstable layers at about 12 km is observed at Koror, with large frequencies of occurrence of thick layers at that altitude. Histograms are produced for the two midlatitude stations and one tropical station analyzed. The log–log slopes for troposphere histograms are in reasonable agreement with earlier results, but the LS histograms show a steeper log–log slope, consistent with more thin unstable layers and fewer thick unstable layers there. Some radiosonde stations are excluded from this analysis since a marked change in unstable layer occurrences was identified when a change in radiosonde instrumentation occurred.more » « less