Search for: All records

Hydration free energies of small molecules are commonly used as benchmarks for solvation models. However, errors in predicting hydration free energies are partially due to the force fields used and not just the solvation model. To address this, we have used the 3D reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) of molecular solvation and existing benchmark explicit solvent calculations with a simple element count correction (ECC) to identify problems with the non-bond parameters in the general AMBER force field (GAFF). 3D-RISM was used to calculate hydration free energies of all 642 molecules in the FreeSolv database, and a partial molar volume correction (PMVC), ECC, and their combination (PMVECC) were applied to the results. The PMVECC produced a mean unsigned error of 1.01±0.04kcal/mol and root mean squared error of 1.44±0.07kcal/mol, better than the benchmark explicit solvent calculations from FreeSolv, and required less than 15 s of computing time per molecule on a single CPU core. Importantly, parameters for PMVECC showed systematic errors for molecules containing Cl, Br, I, and P. Applying ECC to the explicit solvent hydration free energies found the same systematic errors. The results strongly suggest that some small adjustments to the Lennard–Jones parameters for GAFF will lead to improved hydration free energy calculations for all solvent models. 

Abstract The 3D reference interaction site model (3D‐RISM) of molecular solvation is a powerful tool for computing the equilibrium thermodynamics and density distributions of solvents, such as water and co‐ions, around solute molecules. However, 3D‐RISM solutions can be expensive to calculate, especially for proteins and other large molecules where calculating the potential energy between solute and solvent requires more than half the computation time. To address this problem, we have developed and implemented treecode summation for long‐range interactions and analytically corrected cut‐offs for short‐range interactions to accelerate the potential energy and long‐range asymptotics calculations in non‐periodic 3D‐RISM in the AmberTools molecular modeling suite. For the largest single protein considered in this work, tubulin, the total computation time was reduced by a factor of 4. In addition, parallel calculations with these new methods scale almost linearly and the iterative solver remains the largest impediment to parallel scaling. To demonstrate the utility of our approach for large systems, we used 3D‐RISM to calculate the solvation thermodynamics and density distribution of 7‐ring microtubule, consisting of 910 tubulin dimers, over 1.2 million atoms.