Search for: All records

Viruses infecting aquatic microbes vary immensely in size, but the ecological consequences of virus size are poorly understood. Here we used a unique suite of diverse phytoplankton strains and their viruses, all isolated from waters around Hawai'i, to assess whether virus size affects the suppression of host populations. We found that small viruses of diverse genome type (3–24 kb genome size, 23–70 nm capsid diameter) have very similar effects on host populations, suppressing hosts less strongly and for a shorter period of time compared to large double‐stranded DNA viruses (214–1380 kb, 112–386 nm). Suppressive effects of larger viruses were more heterogeneous, but most isolates reduced host populations by many orders of magnitude, without recovery over the ~ 25‐d experiments. Our results suggest that disparate lineages of viruses may have ecological consequences that are predictable in part based on size, and that ecosystem impacts of viral infection may vary with the size structure of the viral community. 

A large fraction of marine primary production is performed by diverse small protists, and many of these phytoplankton are phagotrophic mixotrophs that vary widely in their capacity to consume bacterial prey. Prior analyses suggest that mixotrophic protists as a group vary in importance across ocean environments, but the mechanisms leading to broad functional diversity among mixotrophs, and the biogeochemical consequences of this, are less clear. Here we use isolates from seven major taxa to demonstrate a tradeoff between phototrophic performance (growth in the absence of prey) and phagotrophic performance (clearance rate when consuming Prochlorococcus ). We then show that trophic strategy along the autotrophy-mixotrophy spectrum correlates strongly with global niche differences, across depths and across gradients of stratification and chlorophyll a . A model of competition shows that community shifts can be explained by greater fitness of faster-grazing mixotrophs when nutrients are scarce and light is plentiful. Our results illustrate how basic physiological constraints and principles of resource competition can organize complexity in the surface ocean ecosystem.