Search for: All records

Cervical laminoplasty is a useful for treatment for cervical myelopathy. However, this procedure has limitations for kyphotic cervical alignments. We used the finite element (FE) analysis and investigated the biomechanical changes in intact and laminoplasty models with lordosis, straight, and kyphosis cervical alignments. A three-dimensional FE model of the cervical spine (C2–C7) with ligaments was created from computer tomography. The model was modified with the following cobb angles (a) intact–lordotic model (intact–L; C2–C7 angle: −10°), (b) intact–straight model (intact–S; C2–C7 angle: 0°), and (c) intact–kyphotic model (intact–K; C2–C7 angle: 10°). The C3–C6 laminoplasty was conducted on the three intact models, represented by the laminoplasty–lordosis model (LM–L), laminoplasty–straight model (LM–S), and laminoplasty–kyphosis model (LM–K), respectively. Pure moment with compressive follower load of 100 N to represent the weight of the head/cranium and cervical muscle stabilization was applied to these models and the range of motion (ROM), annular stress, nucleus stress and facet forces were analyzed. ROM of intact–K and LM–K increased when compared to the other models. The LM–K had the highest mobility with 324% increase in ROM observed under extension, compared to LM–L. In addition, the annular stresses and nucleus stresses in intact–K and LM–K were higher compared to the other models. The maximum increase in annular stresses was about 309% in LM–K compared to the LM–L, observed at the C3–C4 segment. However, the facet contact forces were lower in the intact–K and LM–K, compared to the other models. Cases with cervical kyphosis alignment are at a disadvantage compared to cases with lordosis or straight alignment and should be treated with caution. 

IntroductionThe correlation between cervical alignment and clinical outcome of total disc replacement (TDR) surgery is arguable. We believe that this conflict exists because the parameters that influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine are not well understood, specifically the effect of TDR on different cervical alignments. Methods:A validated osseo-ligamentous model from C2-C7 was used in this study. The C2-C7 Cobb angle of the base model was modified to represent: lordotic (−10°), straight (0°), and kyphotic (+10°) cervical alignment. The TDR surgery was simulated at the C5-C6 segment. The range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, annular stresses, and facet loads were computed for all the models. Results:The ROM results demonstrated kyphotic alignment after TDR surgery to be the most mobile when compared to intact base model (41% higher in flexion–extension, 51% higher in lateral bending, and 27% higher in axial rotation) followed by straight and lordotic alignment, respectively. The annular stresses for the kyphotic alignment when compared to intact base model were higher at the index level (33% higher in flexion–extension and 48% higher in lateral bending) compared to other alignments. The lordotic model demonstrated higher facet contact forces at the index level (75% higher in extension than kyphotic alignment, 51% higher in lateral bending than kyphotic alignment, and 78% higher in axial rotation than kyphotic alignment) when compared among the three alignment models. Conclusion:Preoperative cervical alignment should be an integral part of surgical planning for TDR surgery as different cervical alignments may significantly alter the postsurgical outcomes. 

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical differences of different rod configurations following anterior column realignment (ACR) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for an optimal correction technique and rod configuration that would minimize the risk of rod failure.Methods: A validated spinopelvic (L1-pelvis) finite element model was used to simulate ACR at the L3–4 level. The ACR procedure was followed by dual-rod fixation, and for 4-rod constructs, either medial/lateral accessory rods (connected to primary rods) or satellite rods (directly connected to ACR level screws). The range of motion (ROM), maximum von Mises stress on the rods, and factor of safety (FOS) were calculated for the ACR models and compared to the existing literature of different PSO rod configurations.Results: All of the 4-rod ACR constructs showed a reduction in ROM and maximum von Mises stress compared to the dual-rod ACR construct. Additionally, all of the 4-rod ACR constructs showed greater percentage reduction in ROM and maximum von Mises stress compared to the PSO 4-rod configurations. The ACR satellite rod construct had the maximum stress reduction i.e., 47.3% compared to dual-rod construct and showed the highest FOS (4.76). These findings are consistent with existing literature that supports the use of satellite rods to reduce the occurrence of rod fracture.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the ACR satellite rod construct may be the most beneficial in reducing the risk of rod failure compared to all other PSO and ACR constructs.