Researchers and city practitioners are paramount stakeholders in creating urban resilience but have diverse and potentially competing views. To understand varying stakeholder perspectives, we conducted a systematic literature content analysis on green infrastructure (GI) and reflective pavement (RP). The analysis shows a United States (US)-based science-practice disconnect in written communication, potentially hindering holistic decision-making. We identified 191 GI and 93 RP impacts, categorized into co-benefits, trade-offs, disservices, or neutral. Impacts were further classified as environmental, social, or economic. The analysis demonstrates that US city practitioners emphasize social and economic co-benefits that may not be fully represented in the scientific discourse. Scientists communicate a broader range of impacts, including trade-offs and disservices, highlighting a nuanced understanding of the potential consequences. Identifying contrasting perspectives and integrating knowledge from various agents is critical in urban climate governance. Our findings facilitate bridging the science-policy disconnect in the US heat mitigation literature.
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract -
Free, publicly-accessible full text available February 1, 2025
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 1, 2025
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2025
-
Municipalities often consider heat mitigation strategies to address urban overheating, but the location of implementation rarely is co-located with the communities that are carrying the majority of the heat burden in the city. The City of Phoenix, is redeveloping a public housing community with a focus on urban cooling as a desired outcome. This research uses in situ measurements (including the mobile micro-meteorological measurement cart, MaRTy) and ENVI-met microscale modeling of the neighborhood to assess air temperature (Tair) cooling capabilities of the planned redesigns to the neighborhood. After validating the ENVI-met model of the current neighborhood with fixed and mobile measurements with an index of agreement d > 0.9 and d > 0.8, respectively, analysis of the planned urban design shows some cool spots connected to new shade and vegetated corridors with Tair cooling magnitudes as high as 3 °C. Yet, some exposed and building-adjacent areas were identified as potential hot spots in the planned neighborhood. These hotspots underscore the importance of continued collaboration among the City, researchers, and the community to address the needs of the community for the creation of healthier urban environments.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available November 1, 2024
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available March 2, 2025
-
Outdoor heat stress is a growing problem in cities during hot weather. City planners and designers require more pedestrian-centered approaches to understand sidewalk microclimates. Radiation loading, as quantified by mean radiant temperature (TMRT), is a key factor driving poor thermal comfort. Street trees provide shade and consequently reduce pedestrian TMRT. However, placement of trees to optimize the cooling they provide is not yet well understood. We apply the newly-developed TUF-Pedestrian model to quantify the impacts of sidewalk tree coverage on pedestrian TMRT during summer for a lowrise neighbourhood in a midlatitude city. TUF-Pedestrian captures the detailed spatio-temporal variation of direct shading and directional longwave radiation loading on pedestrians resulting from tree shade. We conduct 190 multi-day simulations to assess a full range of sidewalk street tree coverages for five high heat exposure locations across four street orientations. We identify street directions that exhibit the largest TMRT reductions during the hottest periods of the day as a result of tree planting. Importantly, planting a shade tree on a street where none currently exist provides approximately 1.5–2 times as much radiative cooling to pedestrians as planting the same tree on a street where most of the sidewalk already benefits from tree shade. Thus, a relatively equal distribution of trees among sun-exposed pedestrian routes and sidewalks within a block or neighbourhood avoids mutual shading and therefore optimizes outdoor radiative heat reduction per tree during warm conditions. Ultimately, street tree planting should be a place-based decision and account for additional environmental and socio-political factors.more » « less