Search for: All records

Accurate representation of air‐sea interaction is crucial to numerical prediction of the ocean, weather, and climate. Sea surface temperature (SST) gradients and surface currents in the oceanic mesoscale regime are known to have significant influence on air‐sea fluxes of momentum. Studies based on high‐resolution numerical models and observations reveal that SST gradients and surface currents in the submesoscale regime are much stronger than those in the mesoscale. However, the feedback between the submesoscale processes and the air‐sea turbulent fluxes is not well understood. To quantitatively assess the responses between air‐sea flux of momentum and submesoscale processes, a non‐hydrostatic ocean model is implemented in this study. The inclusion of SST gradients and surface currents in air‐sea bulk fluxes are argued to be significant for modeling accurate wind stress in the submesoscale regime. Taking both into account, this study shows that the linear relationship between wind stress curl/divergence and crosswind/downwind SST gradients existing in the mesoscale regime is not obvious in the submesoscale. Instead, a linear relationship between wind stress curl/divergence and surface current curl/divergence is revealed in the submesoscale. Furthermore, the magnitude of wind stress curl introduced by submesoscale processes is much greater than that presented by mesoscale processes. Another key finding is that tracer subduction and potential vorticity distribution in the submesoscale is susceptible to submesoscale‐modified air‐sea turbulent momentum flux. This study serves as a starting point in investigating the feedbacks between atmospheric and oceanic submesoscale processes.