Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
more » « less
Abstract Motivated by the need to interpret the results from a combined use of
in vivo brain Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), we developed a computational framework to study the sensitivity of single-frequency MRE and DTI metrics to white matter microstructure and cell-level mechanical and diffusional properties. White matter was modeled as a triphasic unidirectional composite, consisting of parallel cylindrical inclusions (axons) surrounded by sheaths (myelin), and embedded in a matrix (glial cells plus extracellular matrix). Only 2D mechanics and diffusion in the transverse plane (perpendicular to the axon direction) was considered, and homogenized (effective) properties were derived for a periodic domain containing a single axon. The numerical solutions of the MRE problem were performed with ABAQUS and by employing a sophisticated boundary-conforming grid generation scheme. Based on the linear viscoelastic response to harmonic shear excitation and steady-state diffusion in the transverse plane, a systematic sensitivity analysis of MRE metrics (effective transverse shear storage and loss moduli) and DTI metric (effective radial diffusivity) was performed for a wide range of microstructural and intrinsic (phase-based) physical properties. The microstructural properties considered were fiber volume fraction, and the myelin sheath/axon diameter ratio. The MRE and DTI metrics are very sensitive to the fiber volume fraction, and the intrinsic viscoelastic moduli of the glial phase. The MRE metrics are nonlinear functions of the fiber volume fraction, but the effective diffusion coefficient varies linearly with it. Finally, the transverse metrics of both MRE and DTI are insensitive to the axon diameter in steady state. Our results are consistent with the limited anisotropic MRE and co-registered DTI measurements, mainly in thecorpus callosum , available in the literature. We conclude that isotropic MRE and DTI constitutive models are good approximations for myelinated white matter in the transverse plane. The unidirectional composite model presented here is used for the first time to model harmonic shear stress under MRE-relevant frequency on the cell level. This model can be extended to 3D in order to inform the solution of the inverse problem in MRE, establish the biological basis of MRE metrics, and integrate MRE/DTI with other modalities towards increasing the specificity of neuroimaging. -
more » « less
Purpose Estimating microstructural parameters of skeletal muscle from diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal requires understanding the relative importance of both microstructural and dMRI sequence parameters on the signal. This study seeks to determine the sensitivity of dMRI signal to variations in microstructural and dMRI sequence parameters, as well as assess the effect of noise on sensitivity.
Methods Using a cylindrical myocyte model of skeletal muscle, numerical solutions of the Bloch‐Torrey equation were used to calculate global sensitivity indices of dMRI metrics (FA, RD, MD,
, , ) for wide ranges of microstructural and dMRI sequence parameters. The microstructural parameters were: myocyte diameter, volume fraction, membrane permeability, intra‐ and extracellular diffusion coefficients, and intra‐ and extracellular times. Two separate pulse sequences were examined, a PGSE and a generalized diffusion‐weighted sequence that accommodates a larger range of diffusion times. The effect of noise and signal averaging on the sensitivity of the dMRI metrics was examined by adding synthetic noise to the simulated signal. Results Among the examined parameters, the intracellular diffusion coefficient has the strongest effect, and myocyte diameter is more influential than permeability for FA and RD. The sensitivity indices do not vary significantly between the two pulse sequences. Also, noise strongly affects the sensitivity of the dMRI signal to microstructural variations.
Conclusions With the identification of key microstructural features that affect dMRI measurements, the reported sensitivity results can help interpret dMRI measurements of skeletal muscle in terms of the underlying microstructure and further develop parsimonious dMRI models of skeletal muscle.
