Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
The asymmetric unit of the title salt, C 21 H 18 N 4 2+ ·2Br − , comprises half of the molecule and a bromide ion. The chevron-shaped cations stack as columns in the [001] direction with suitable intermolecular distance for π–π interactions. These cationic columns are further stabilized by intercolumnar C—H...N hydrogen bonding with the bromide ions distributed between them.more » « less
-
The chevron-shaped cations of the title hydrated salt, C 25 H 22 N 4 2+ ·2Br − ·2H 2 O, are arranged in back-to-back alternating directions to form a zigzag ribbon propagating along the [010] direction. Intermolecular interactions comprising these ribbons are π–π interactions between the pyridinium and adjacent pyridyl rings, as well as O—H...O hydrogen bonding between water molecules and two adjacent pyridyl N atoms. Half of the cation is generated by the mirror plane. The water O atoms, the central C atom and one Br atom are located on this mirror plane while the other Br atom is on a twofold screw axis.more » « less
-
The title compound, [Pt(C 4 N 2 S 2 ) 2 (NH 3 ) 2 ], represents an octahedral platinum(IV) complex with two trans- ammine and two mnt (mnt = 1,2-dicyanoethene-1,2-dithiolato) ligands. The Pt—N and Pt—S distances are consistent with those in other platinum(IV) complexes. As a result of a slight canting of the coordination of the mnt ligand to the platinum(IV) atom, the nitrile nitrogen atoms are positioned suitably to hydrogen-bond with adjacent ammines.more » « less
-
The re-investigated structure of the title compound, [Cu 2 I 2 (C 12 H 10 N 2 )] n , a two-dimensional coordination polymer crystallizing with monoclinic ( P 2 1 / n ) symmetry, is based on data collected at 100 K, while the previously reported structure was obtained with data collected at 203 K [Blake et al. (1999). Cryst. Eng. 2 , 181–195]. The refinement of the crystal structure is greatly improved; for example, the wR 2 residual converges to 0.047 for 1532 independent data, versus wR 2 = 0.179 for 992 independent data in the 1999 study.more » « less