Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Hydrogen-rich supernovae (SNe) span a range of hydrogen envelope masses at core collapse, producing diverse light curves from extended plateaus in Type IIP SNe to double-peaked Type IIb SNe (SNe IIb). Recent simulations predict a continuous sequence of light-curve morphologies as hydrogen is removed, with short-plateau (SP; plateau durations ≈50–70 days) SNe emerging as a transitional class. However, the observational boundary between types IIb and SP remains poorly defined, and thus far unobserved. We report on extensive photometric and spectroscopic follow-up of SN 2023wdd and SN 2022acrv, two candidate transitional events on the low-mass end of the SP class. Both exhibit weak, double-peaked light curves, which we interpret as exceptionally short plateaus (10–20 days), and hybrid spectral features: persistent Hαabsorption with HeIcontamination, but without the helium dominance characteristic of SNe IIb. Using analytic shock-cooling models and numerical light-curve fitting, we estimate H-rich envelope masses of ∼0.6–0.8M⊙—significantly larger than canonical IIb values (≲0.1M⊙) but consistent with the ∼0.9M⊙threshold predicted for short-plateau behavior. Although the progenitor radii inferred from analytic and numerical methods differ by factors of 2–5, envelope mass estimates are consistent across approaches. Comparisons to well-studied Type IIb (SN 2016gkg, SN 2022hnt), SP (SN 2023ufx, SN 2006ai, SN 2016egz, SN 2006Y), and Type II (SN 2023ixf, SN 2013ej) SNe suggests a monotonic relationship between hydrogen envelope mass and plateau length, consistent with analytic and numerical expectations. These findings provide additional evidence for a continuous distribution of envelope stripping in H-rich core-collapse progenitors, and place SN 2023wdd and SN 2022acrv along the IIb–SP boundary.more » « less
-
Abstract The nearby type II supernova, SN 2023ixf in M101 exhibits signatures of early time interaction with circumstellar material in the first week postexplosion. This material may be the consequence of prior mass loss suffered by the progenitor, which possibly manifested in the form of a detectable presupernova outburst. We present an analysis of long-baseline preexplosion photometric data in theg,w,r,i,z, andyfilters from Pan-STARRS as part of the Young Supernova Experiment, spanning ∼5000 days. We find no significant detections in the Pan-STARRS preexplosion light curves. We train a multilayer perceptron neural network to classify presupernova outbursts. We find no evidence of eruptive presupernova activity to a limiting absolute magnitude of −7 mag. The limiting magnitudes from the full set ofgwrizy(average absolute magnitude ≈ −8 mag) data are consistent with previous preexplosion studies. We use deep photometry from the literature to constrain the progenitor of SN 2023ixf, finding that these data are consistent with a dusty red supergiant progenitor with luminosity ≈ 5.12 and temperature ≈ 3950 K, corresponding to a mass of 14–20M⊙.more » « less
-
Abstract SN 2018aoz is a Type Ia SN with a B -band plateau and excess emission in infant-phase light curves ≲1 day after the first light, evidencing an over-density of surface iron-peak elements as shown in our previous study. Here, we advance the constraints on the nature and origin of SN 2018aoz based on its evolution until the nebular phase. Near-peak spectroscopic features show that the SN is intermediate between two subtypes of normal Type Ia: core normal and broad line. The excess emission may be attributable to the radioactive decay of surface iron-peak elements as well as the interaction of ejecta with either the binary companion or a small torus of circumstellar material. Nebular-phase limits on H α and He i favor a white dwarf companion, consistent with the small companion size constrained by the low early SN luminosity, while the absence of [O i ] and He i disfavors a violent merger of the progenitor. Of the two main explosion mechanisms proposed to explain the distribution of surface iron-peak elements in SN 2018aoz, the asymmetric Chandrasekhar-mass explosion is less consistent with the progenitor constraints and the observed blueshifts of nebular-phase [Fe ii ] and [Ni ii ]. The helium-shell double-detonation explosion is compatible with the observed lack of C spectral features, but current 1D models are incompatible with the infant-phase excess emission, B max – V max color, and weak strength of nebular-phase [Ca ii ]. Although the explosion processes of SN 2018aoz still need to be more precisely understood, the same processes could produce a significant fraction of Type Ia SNe that appear to be normal after ∼1 day.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
