Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Microalgae are the main source of the omega‐3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), essential for the healthy development of most marine and terrestrial fauna including humans. Inverse correlations of algal EPA and DHA proportions (% of total fatty acids) with temperature have led to suggestions of a warming‐induced decline in the global production of these biomolecules and an enhanced importance of high latitude organisms for their provision. The cold Arctic Ocean is a potential hotspot of EPA and DHA production, but consequences of global warming are unknown. Here, we combine a full‐seasonal EPA and DHA dataset from the Central Arctic Ocean (CAO), with results from 13 previous field studies and 32 cultured algal strains to examine five potential climate change effects; ice algae loss, community shifts, increase in light, nutrients, and temperature. The algal EPA and DHA proportions were lower in the ice‐covered CAO than in warmer peripheral shelf seas, which indicates that the paradigm of an inverse correlation of EPA and DHA proportions with temperature may not hold in the Arctic. We found no systematic differences in the summed EPA and DHA proportions of sea ice versus pelagic algae, and in diatoms versus non‐diatoms. Overall, the algal EPA and DHA proportions varied up to four‐fold seasonally and 10‐fold regionally, pointing to strong light and nutrient limitations in the CAO. Where these limitations ease in a warming Arctic, EPA and DHA proportions are likely to increase alongside increasing primary production, with nutritional benefits for a non‐ice‐associated food web.more » « less
-
Abstract The Bering Sea is a highly productive subarctic ecosystem with some of the most valuable commercial fisheries in the United States. This seasonally ice‐covered sea has been rapidly changing due to ocean warming with impacts to the ecosystem structure and fisheries. The long‐term effects of these shifts on primary producers, however, are still unknown. Continuous monitoring of primary productivity in the Bering Sea is critical, yet observations that capture the ephemeral nature of plankton are challenging to sustain. To address this gap, high temporal resolution primary productivity rates were quantified at a mooring site (M2) in the southeastern Bering Sea in 2021. From a suite of sensors at M2 (fluorescence, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and total dissolved gas pressure), we calculated gross primary productivity (GPP), net primary productivity (NPP), and net community productivity (NCP), the latter based on net biological oxygen saturation using dissolved oxygen/nitrogen (O2/N2) ratios. These estimates elucidate weekly patterns from the spring bloom through fall, when the water column becomes well‐mixed. In 2021, we observed average productivity during the spring bloom, yet wind patterns and mixing dynamics during the spring contributed to low productivity during summer and fall. The 2021 productivity metrics (GPP, NPP, and NCP) were compared across the growing season and contrasted with seasonal productivity estimates at M2 in previous years with consideration given to variability of ice conditions (warm/cold years) and wind stress.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available November 1, 2026
An official website of the United States government
