Search for: All records

Abstract MotivationSequences equivalent to their reverse complements (i.e. double-stranded DNA) have no analogue in text analysis and non-biological string algorithms. Despite this striking difference, algorithms designed for computational biology (e.g. sketching algorithms) are designed and tested in the same way as classical string algorithms. Then, as a post-processing step, these algorithms are adapted to work with genomic sequences by folding a k-mer and its reverse complement into a single sequence: The canonical representation (k-nonical space). ResultsThe effect of using the canonical representation with sketching methods is understudied and not understood. As a first step, we use context-free sketching methods to illustrate the potentially detrimental effects of using canonical k-mers with string algorithms not designed to accommodate for them. In particular, we show that large stretches of the genome (“sketching deserts”) are undersampled or entirely skipped by context-free sketching methods, effectively making these genomic regions invisible to subsequent algorithms using these sketches. We provide empirical data showing these effects and develop a theoretical framework explaining the appearance of sketching deserts. Finally, we propose two schemes to accommodate for these effects: (i) a new procedure that adapts existing sketching methods to k-nonical space and (ii) an optimization procedure to directly design new sketching methods for k-nonical space. Availability and implementationThe code used in this analysis is available under a permissive license at https://github.com/Kingsford-Group/mdsscope. 

Abstract SummaryComputational cell-type deconvolution is an important analytic technique for modeling the compositional heterogeneity of bulk gene expression data. A conceptually new Bayesian approach to this problem, BayesPrism, has recently been proposed and has subsequently been shown to be superior in accuracy and robustness against model misspecifications by independent studies; however, given that BayesPrism relies on Gibbs sampling, it is orders of magnitude more computationally expensive than standard approaches. Here, we introduce the InstaPrism package which re-implements BayesPrism in a derandomized framework by replacing the time-consuming Gibbs sampling step with a fixed-point algorithm. We demonstrate that the new algorithm is effectively equivalent to BayesPrism while providing a considerable speed and memory advantage. Furthermore, the InstaPrism package is equipped with a precompiled, curated set of references tailored for a variety of cancer types, streamlining the deconvolution process. Availability and implementationThe package InstaPrism is freely available at: https://github.com/humengying0907/InstaPrism. The source code and evaluation pipeline used in this paper can be found at: https://github.com/humengying0907/InstaPrismSourceCode.