skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Niziolek, Caroline A"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 19, 2026
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 10, 2026
  3. Previous work shows that sensorimotor learning can be specific to different motor contexts, but to date, this research has only examined contexts provided by the same effector as the learning target or its contralateral pair. We show that laryngeal movements for pitch enable differentiated learning of oral articulator movements for vowels, even when the pitch is linguistically meaningless. This indicates that motor contexts that enable learning can be generated by effectors distinct from those that undergo learning. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 1, 2026
  4. Motor planning forms a critical bridge between psycholinguistic and motoric models of word production. While syllables are often considered the core planning unit in speech, growing evidence hints at supra-syllabic planning, but without firm empirical support. Here, we use differential adaptation to altered auditory feedback to provide novel, straightforward evidence for word-level planning. By introducing opposing perturbations to shared segmental content (e.g., raising the first vowel formant of “sev” in “seven” while lowering it in “sever”), we assess whether participants can use the larger word context to separately oppose the two perturbations. Critically, limb control research shows that such differential learning is possible only when the shared movement forms part of separate motor plans. We found differential adaptation in multisyllabic words, but of smaller size relative to monosyllabic words. These results strongly suggest speech relies on an interactive motor planning process encompassing both syllables and words. 
    more » « less