Search for: All records

Abstract Climate change is causing marked shifts to historic environmental regimes, including increases in precipitation events (droughts and highly wet periods). Relative to droughts, the impacts of wet events have received less attention, despite heavy rainfall events increasing over the past century. Further, impacts of wet and dry events are often evaluated independently; yet, to persist and maintain their ecosystem functions, plant communities must be resilient to both precipitation events. This is particularly critical because while community properties can modulate the resilience (resistance, recovery, and invariability) of ecosystem functions to precipitation events, community properties can also respond to precipitation events. As a result, community responses to wet and dry years may impact the community's resilience to future events.Using two decades (2000–2020) of annual net primary productivity data from early successional grassland communities, we evaluated the plant community properties regulating primary productivity resistance and recovery to contrasting precipitation events and invariability (i.e. long‐term stability). We then explored how resilience‐modulating community properties responded to precipitation.We found that community properties—specifically, evenness, dominant species (Solidago altissima) relative abundance, and species richness—strongly regulate productivity resistance to drought and predict productivity invariability and tended to promote resistance to wet years. These community properties also responded to both wet and dry precipitation extremes and exhibited lagged responses that lasted into the next growing season. We infer that these connections between precipitation events, community properties, and resilience may lead to feedbacks impacting a plant community's resilience to subsequent precipitation events.Synthesis. By exploring the impacts of both drought and wet extremes, our work uncovers how precipitation events, which may not necessarily impact productivity directly, could still cryptically influence resilience via shifts in resilience‐promoting properties of the plant community. We conclude that these precipitation event‐driven community shifts may feedback to impact long‐term productivity resilience under climate change. 

Phytophthora is a long-established, well known and globally important genus of plant pathogens. Phylogenetic evidence has shown that the biologically distinct, obligate biotrophic downy mildews evolved from Phytophthora at least twice. Since, cladistically, this renders Phytophthora ‘paraphyletic’, it has been proposed that Phytophthora evolutionary clades be split into multiple genera (Runge et al. 2011; Crous et al. 2021; Thines et al. 2023; Thines 2024). In this letter, we review arguments for the retention of the generic name Phytophthora with a broad circumscription made by Brasier et al. (2022) and by many delegates at an open workshop organized by the American Phytopathological Society. We present our well-considered responses to this proposal in general terms and to the specific proposals for new genera; together with new information regarding the biological properties and mode of origin of the Phytophthora clades. We consider that the proposals for new genera are mostly non-rigorous and not supported by the scientific evidence. Further, given (1) the apparent lack of any distinguishing biological characteristics (synapomorphies) between the Phytophthora clades; (2) the fundamental monophyly of Phytophthora in the original Haeckelian sense; (3) the fact that paraphyly is not a justification for taxonomic splitting; and (4) the considerable likely damage to effective scientific communication and disease management from an unnecessary break-up of the genus, we report that Workshop delegates voted unanimously in favour of preserving the current generic concept and for seeking endorsement of this view by a working group of the International Commission on the Taxonomy of Fungi.