Search for: All records

Over the past two decades, Iceland has experienced an unprecedented increase in its immigrant population, necessitating development of comprehensive and context-sensitive integration policies and practices. Within this context, it is crucial to gain a deeper understanding of immigrant women's integration strategies and experiences, particularly within the essential domain of economic integration. This is especially important given their heightened vulnerability during periods of crisis, including pandemics. This paper seeks to advance understanding of the lived experiences of immigrant women in Iceland from the perspective of immigrants themselves. It focuses on how gender, ethnicity, religion, motherhood, and immigration status shaped their trajectories of economic integration during the COVID-19 pandemic and the recovery period. This study addresses two primary research questions: (1) What are underlying and pandemic-driven factors influencing immigrant women's experiences within the economic domain of integration in Iceland's northern communities? (2) What are the constraints associated with immigrant women's economic integration during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and what are the strengths (facilitating factors)? Drawing on qualitative research methods, this study is based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted in 2022 and 2023 with immigrant women residing in smaller, remote urban and rural communities in the Northeastern Region of Iceland. Utilizing both strength-based and deficit-based analytical approaches, this paper provides a comprehensive examination of key strengths and constraints shaping immigrant women lived experiences, analyzed through the lens of both underlying and pandemic-driven factors within the economic domain. The study findings reveal that, despite the Icelandic government's strong commitment to gender equality in the labor market and its comprehensive welfare system and support programs, significant constraints to immigrant women's economic integration persisted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath. These constraints were primarily linked to language barriers, informal, nepotism-driven employment practices, gender biases, and limited labor market opportunities within the Arctic economy, especially for highly educated female immigrants. 

This White Paper presents a reflection on processes and practices, including hidden and silenced issues, of conducting social research with Indigenous communities in the Arctic and describes key principles guiding this work and practical recommendations to achieve greater societal relevance and culturally grounded research practices. These principles include implementing "humanized" research procedures, prioritizing practically oriented research that addresses community needs,(w)holism in the social research framework, emphasizing personal storytelling and a voice-centered approach, employing the "two-eyed seeing,” and ensuring research accuracy through participant feedback on the research team’s interpretations, among others. The paper further discusses challenges in efforts to strengthen Arctic research methods and approaches. 

Abstract: Short statement submitted to the 2026 Arctic Observing Summit. 

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic recovery in urban communities in the Arctic have been substantial, but their gendered aspects remain largely unknown. The goal of this study was to enhance the understanding of the gender-based impact on women in the urban areas of Alaska by exploring strengths and constraints to resilience in the social and economic domains of gender equality during and in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on grounded theory methodology, this study is based on 29 in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The study methodology utilized a conceptual framework that integrated deficit-based and strength-based analytical perspectives. The paper implemented a voice-centered approach that drew on thematic interviews conducted with women in Anchorage and Nome. Alaska’s urban women demonstrated resilience rooted in self-empowerment and community caregiving. This was reflected in their critical re-evaluation of social and economic gendered structures, a reassessment of priorities in family and social relationships, and the mobilization of support networks. These acts of reflection and care transformed into processes of constructing new meanings of life during dramatic events and became a source of personal strength. The crisis also enabled a re-evaluation of entrenched gender dynamics and women’s ability to challenge gendered divisions in both the workplace and at home. Despite signs of resilience, the pandemic signified a setback for gender equality. It exacerbated pre-existing gender disparities within households, disrupted established pre-pandemic social support networks, increased unpaid domestic labor and a motherhood penalty, and deepened unemployment and income gaps. To further adapt to post-pandemic conditions, women need empowerment and greater representation in decision-making roles, which are critical to strengthening resilience in both the social and economic domains of gender equality. 

Indigenous understanding of sustainability is embedded in close relations to land and environment, Indigenous Knowledge systems, Indigenous epistemologies and ontologies, and Indigenous languages. However, the sustainability of Indigenous peoples’ livelihoods is significantly affected by various global change drivers. In the Arctic, Indigenous peoples’ livelihoods are impacted by environmental, social, and cultural changes, including climate change, environmental pollution, economic processes, and resource extraction. This paper aims to review and synthesize recent academic and gray literature on the sustainability of Indigenous communities in Sakha Republic, Northeast Siberia, Russia in the face of global change with a particular focus on land- and water-based traditional activities, native language, and the Indigenous Knowledge system. 

ObjectivesThis study examines the COVID-19 pandemic’s spatiotemporal dynamics in 52 sub-regions in eight Arctic states. This study further investigates the potential impact of early vaccination coverage on subsequent COVID-19 outcomes within these regions, potentially revealing public health insights of global significance. MethodsWe assessed the outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic in Arctic sub-regions using three key epidemiological variables: confirmed cases, confirmed deaths, and case fatality ratio (CFR), along with vaccination rates to evaluate the effectiveness of the early vaccination campaign on the later dynamics of COVID-19 outcomes in these regions. ResultsFrom February 2020 to February 2023, the Arctic experienced five distinct waves of COVID-19 infections and fatalities. However, most Arctic regions consistently maintained Case Fatality Ratios (CFRs) below their respective national levels throughout these waves. Further, the regression analysis indicated that the impact of initial vaccination coverage on subsequent cumulative mortality rates and Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) was inverse and statistically significant. A common trend was the delayed onset of the pandemic in the Arctic due to its remoteness. A few regions, including Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Northern Canada, Finland, and Norway, experienced isolated spikes in cases at the beginning of the pandemic with minimal or no fatalities. In contrast, Alaska, Northern Sweden, and Russia had generally high death rates, with surges in cases and fatalities. ConclusionAnalyzing COVID-19 data from 52 Arctic subregions shows significant spatial and temporal variations in the pandemic’s severity. Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Northern Canada, Finland, and Norway exemplify successful pandemic management models characterized by low cases and deaths. These outcomes can be attributed to successful vaccination campaigns, and proactive public health initiatives along the delayed onset of the pandemic, which reduced the impact of COVID-19, given structural and population vulnerabilities. Thus, the Arctic experience of COVID-19 informs preparedness for future pandemic-like public health emergencies in remote regions and marginalized communities worldwide that share similar contexts.