skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM ET on Friday, December 19 until 7:00 AM ET on Saturday, December 20 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Phillippe, Austin J."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Bacterial contamination of surface water is a public health concern. To quantify the efflux ofEscherichia coliinto ephemeral and intermittent streams and assess its numbers in relation to secondary body contact standards, we monitored runoff and measuredE. colinumbers from 10 experimental watersheds that differed in vegetation cover and cattle access in north‐central Oklahoma.Escherichia colinumbers were not significantly different among the watersheds, with one exception; the grazed prairie watershed (GP1) had greater numbers compared to one ungrazed prairie watershed (UP2). MedianE. colinumbers in runoff from ungrazed watersheds ranged from 260 to 1482 MPN/100 mL in comparison with grazed watersheds that ranged from 320 to 8878 MPN/100 mL. In the GP1 watershed, higher cattle stocking rates during pre‐ and post‐calving (February–May) resulted in significantly greater bacterial numbers and event loading compared to periods with lower stocking rates. The lack of significance among watersheds is likely due to the grazed sites being rotationally (and lightly) grazed, data variability, and wildlife contributions. To address wildlife sources, we used camera trap data to assess the usage in the watersheds; however, the average number of animals in a 24‐h period did not correlate with observed medianE. colinumbers. Because of its impacts onE. colinumbers in water, grazing management (stocking rate, rotation, and timing) should be considered for improving water quality in streams and reservoirs. 
    more » « less