skip to main content

Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Phillips, Cynthia A."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. We present EASEE (Edge Advertisements into Snapshots using Evolving Expectations) for partitioning streaming communication data into static graph snapshots. Given streaming communication events (A talks to B), EASEE identifies when events suffice for a static graph (a snapshot ). EASEE uses combinatorial statistical models to adaptively find when a snapshot is stable, while watching for significant data shifts – indicating a new snapshot should begin. If snapshots are not found carefully, they poorly represent the underlying data – and downstream graph analytics fail: We show a community detection example. We demonstrate EASEE's strengths against several real-world datasets, and its accuracy against known-answer synthetic datasets. Synthetic datasets' results show that (1) EASEE finds known-answer data shifts very quickly; and (2) ignoring these shifts drastically affects analytics on resulting snapshots. We show that previous work misses these shifts. Further, we evaluate EASEE against seven real-world datasets (330 K to 2.5B events), and find snapshot-over-time behaviors missed by previous works. Finally, we show that the resulting snapshots' measured properties (e.g., graph density) are altered by how snapshots are identified from the communication event stream. In particular, EASEE's snapshots do not generally “densify” over time, contradicting previous influential results that used simpler partitioning methods.
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2023
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 11, 2023
  3. Given an input stream S of size N , a ɸ-heavy hitter is an item that occurs at least ɸN times in S . The problem of finding heavy-hitters is extensively studied in the database literature. We study a real-time heavy-hitters variant in which an element must be reported shortly after we see its T = ɸ N-th occurrence (and hence it becomes a heavy hitter). We call this the Timely Event Detection ( TED ) Problem. The TED problem models the needs of many real-world monitoring systems, which demand accurate (i.e., no false negatives) and timely reporting of all events from large, high-speed streams with a low reporting threshold (high sensitivity). Like the classic heavy-hitters problem, solving the TED problem without false-positives requires large space (Ω (N) words). Thus in-RAM heavy-hitters algorithms typically sacrifice accuracy (i.e., allow false positives), sensitivity, or timeliness (i.e., use multiple passes). We show how to adapt heavy-hitters algorithms to external memory to solve the TED problem on large high-speed streams while guaranteeing accuracy, sensitivity, and timeliness. Our data structures are limited only by I/O-bandwidth (not latency) and support a tunable tradeoff between reporting delay and I/O overhead. With a small bounded reporting delay, ourmore »algorithms incur only a logarithmic I/O overhead. We implement and validate our data structures empirically using the Firehose streaming benchmark. Multi-threaded versions of our structures can scale to process 11M observations per second before becoming CPU bound. In comparison, a naive adaptation of the standard heavy-hitters algorithm to external memory would be limited by the storage device’s random I/O throughput, i.e., ≈100K observations per second.« less