Search for: All records

Abstract Organisms often face a fundamental trade-off between growth and predator avoidance, where traits that enhance growth—such as higher activity rates—also increase predation risk. While many species reduce activity in response to predators, potentially constraining growth, this trade-off can be mitigated if alternative traits, such as resource digestive efficiency, compensate for reduced activity. Such trait compensation could enable organisms to minimize growth costs while evading predators. To test this idea, we combined a mesocosm experiment with lab-based digestive physiological assays to examine survival selection and plasticity in damselfly larvae exposed to fish predators. We found that selection favoured less active individuals, yet this reduction in activity did not suppress growth. Instead, plastic increases in consumption rate, selection for greater assimilation efficiency, and weaker digestive stress responses allowed individuals to maintain growth despite reduced activity and elevated metabolic rates. Our results reveal that selection on digestive physiology can buffer organisms against the putative costs of predator avoidance, demonstrating how trait networks can decouple growth from predation risk in complex ecological systems. 

Abstract Plasticity to reduce activity is a common way prey evade predators. However, by reducing activity prey often experience lower individual growth rates because they encounter their own prey less often. To overcome this cost, natural selection should not simply favor individuals generating stronger plasticity to reduce activity rates but also selection to resume activity once the threat of predation subsides. If such plasticity is adaptive, it should vary under environmental conditions that generate stronger selection for greater plasticity, such as predator density. Using a mesocosm experiment and observational study with a damselfly-prey/fish-predator system, we show that fish predation exerts selection for greater plasticity in activity rates of damselflies. Such selection allows damselfly activity levels to initially decrease and then rebound when the threat of predation dissipates, potentially helping to ameliorate a hypothesized growth penalty from activity reductions. We also find that the extent of plasticity in activity to the threat of fish predation increases, albeit slightly (r2 = 0.04%–0.063%), as fish densities increase across natural lakes, consistent with the idea that the magnitude of plasticity is shaped by environmental conditions underlying selection. Collectively, these results demonstrate how selection acts to drive adaptive plasticity in a common predator avoidance strategy.