Search for: All records

Synopsis Puncture mechanics can be studied in the context of predator–prey interactions and provide bioinspiration for puncture tools and puncture-resistant materials. Lionfish have a passive puncture system where venomous spines (dorsal, anal, and pelvic), the tool, may embed into a predator’s skin, the target material, during an encounter. To examine predator–prey interactions, we quantified the puncture performance of red lionfish, Pterois volitans, spines in buccal skin from two potential predators and porcine skin, a biological model for human skin. We punctured dorsal, anal, and pelvic lionfish spines into three regions of buccal skin from the black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci) and the blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus), and we examined spine macro-damage (visible without a microscope) post puncture. Lionfish spines were more effective, based on lower forces measured and less damage incurred, at puncturing buccal skin of groupers compared to sharks. Anal and dorsal spines incurred the most macro-damage during successful fish skin puncture trials, while pelvic spines did not incur any macro-damage. Lionfish spines were not damaged during porcine skin testing. Anal spines required the highest forces, while pelvic spines required intermediate forces to puncture fish skin. Dorsal spines required the lowest forces to puncture fish skins, but often incurred macro-damage of bent tips. All spine regions required similar forces to puncture porcine skin. These data suggest that lionfish spines may be more effective at puncturing humans such as divers than potential fish predators. These results emphasize that puncture performance is ultimately determined by both the puncture tool and target material choice. Lionfish puncture performance varies among spine region, when taking into account both the puncture force and damage sustained by the spine. 

Since their appearance in the fossil record 34 million years ago, modern cetaceans (dolphins, whales, and porpoises) have radiated into diverse habitats circumglobally, developing vast phenotypic variations among species. Traits such as skeletal morphology and ecologically linked behaviors denote swimming activity; trade-offs in flexibility and rigidity along the vertebral column determine patterns of caudal oscillation. Here, we categorized 10 species of cetaceans (families Delphinidae and Kogiidae; N = 21 animals) into functional groups based on vertebral centra morphology, swimming speeds, diving behavior, and inferred swimming patterns. We quantified trabecular bone mechanical properties (yield strength, apparent stiffness, and resilience) among functional groups and regions of the vertebral column (thoracic, lumbar, and caudal). We extracted 6 mm3 samples from vertebral bodies and tested them in compression in 3 orientations (rostrocaudal, dorsoventral, and mediolateral) at 2 mm min−1. Overall, bone from the pre-fluke/fluke boundary had the greatest yield strength and resilience, indicating that the greatest forces are translated to the tail during caudal oscillatory swimming. Group 1, composed of 5 shallow-diving delphinid species, had the greatest vertebral trabecular bone yield strength, apparent stiffness, and resilience of all functional groups. Conversely, Group 3, composed of 2 deep-diving kogiid species, had the least strong, stiff, and resilient bone, while Group 2 (3 deep-diving delphinid species) exhibited intermediate values. These data suggest that species that incorporate prolonged glides during deep descents in the water column actively swim less, and place relatively smaller loads on their vertebral columns, compared with species that execute shallower dives. We found that cetacean vertebral trabecular bone properties differed from the properties of terrestrial mammals; for every given bone strength, cetacean bone was less stiff by comparison. This relative lack of material rigidity within vertebral bone may be attributed to the non-weight-bearing locomotor modes of fully aquatic mammals.