Search for: All records

Abstract Serine/arginine‐rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) is key in the mRNA lifecycle including transcription, splicing, nonsense‐mediated decay, and nuclear export. Consequently, its dysfunction is linked to cancers, viral evasion, and developmental disorders. The functionality of SRSF1 relies on its interactions with other proteins and RNA molecules. These processes are regulated by phosphorylation of its unstructured arginine/serine‐rich tail (RS). Here, we characterize how phosphorylation affects SRSF1's protein and RNA interaction and phase separation. Using NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement and chemical shift perturbation, we find that when unphosphorylated, SRSF1's RS interacts with its first RNA‐recognition motif (RRM1). Phosphorylation of RS decreases its interactions with the protein‐binding site of RRM1 and increases its interactions with the RNA‐binding site of RRM1. This change in SRSF1's intramolecular interactions increases the availability of protein‐interacting sites on RRM1 and weakens RNA binding of SRSF1. Phosphorylation alters the phase separation of SRSF1 by diminishing the role of arginine in intermolecular interactions. These findings provide an unprecedented view of how SRSF1 influences the early‐stage spliceosome assembly. 

To avoid predation, many animals mimic behaviours and/or coloration of dangerous prey. Here we examine potential sex-specific mimicry in the jumping spider Habronattus pyrrithrix . Previous work proposed that males' conspicuous dorsal coloration paired with characteristic leg-waving (i.e. false antennation) imperfectly mimics hymenopteran insects (e.g. wasps and bees), affording protection to males during mate-searching and courtship. By contrast, less active females are cryptic and display less leg-waving. Here we test the hypothesis that sexually dimorphic dorsal colour patterns in H. pyrrithrix are most effective when paired with sex-specific behaviours. We manipulated spider dorsal coloration with makeup to model the opposite sex and exposed them to a larger salticid predator ( Phidippus californicus ). We predicted that males painted like females should suffer higher predation rates than sham-control males. Likewise, females painted like males should suffer higher predation rates than sham-control females. Contrary to expectations, spiders with male-like coloration were attacked more than those with female-like coloration, regardless of their actual sex. Moreover, males were more likely to be captured, and were captured sooner, than females (regardless of colour pattern). With these unexpected negative results, we discuss alternative functional hypotheses for H. pyrrithrix colours, as well as the evolution of defensive coloration generally. 

Abstract Aposematic signals often allow chemically defended prey to avoid attack from generalist predators, including jumping spiders. However, not all individual predators in a population behave in the same way. Here, in laboratory trials, we document that most individualPhidippus regiusjumping spiders attack and reject chemically defended milkweed bugs (Oncopeltus fasciatus), immediately releasing them unharmed. However, a small number of individuals within the population kill and completely consume these presumably toxic prey items. This phenomenon was infrequent with only 14% of our sample (17/122) consuming the milkweed bugs over the course of the study. Individuals that killed and consumed bugs often did so repeatedly; specifically, individuals that consumed a bug in their first test were more likely to kill a bug in their second test and also tended to consume them again. We explored what might drive some (but not all) individuals to consume these bugs and found that neither sex, sexual maturity, body size, laboratory housing type, nor being wild‐caught or being laboratory‐reared, predicted milkweed bug consumption. Consuming bugs had no negative effects on spider mass or body condition; contrary to expectations, individuals that consumed milkweed bugs actually gained more body mass and increased in body condition. We discuss potential behavioural and physiological variation between individuals that may drive these rare behaviours and the implications for the evolution of prey defences.