Search for: All records

Abstract Reconstructing past oxygen fluctuations in oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) is crucial for understanding their response to climate change. Numerous studies suggest better oxygenation in the Arabian Sea OMZ during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) compared to the Holocene. However, bottom water oxygen (BWO) variability during the Penultimate Glacial Cycle (Marine Isotope Stage [MIS] 6 to MIS 5e, ∼140–115 ka B.P.) remains poorly constrained. This study reconstructs BWO variations during this period from sediment core TN041‐8JPC in the western Arabian Sea OMZ, utilizing proxies including benthic foraminiferal surface porosity, redox‐sensitive trace metal enrichment factors (e.g., U_EF), and U/Ba ratios. Bottom water oxygen concentrations were 24.4 ± 5.9 μmol/kg during MIS 6 and 16.8 ± 6.5 μmol/kg during MIS 5e, with all proxies indicating higher BWO in MIS 6 than in MIS 5e. However, these proxies show different patterns within MIS 5e, indicating that U_EFand U/Ba ratios may be limited to recording average BWO in glacial and interglacial (quasi)steady states. We propose that the intensified OMZ during MIS 5e, relative to MIS 6, was driven by higher productivity, temperature‐induced reductions in oxygen solubility, and reduced delivery of Southern‐sourced intermediate waters. In contrast, the intensified OMZ during the Holocene, compared to the LGM, was likely influenced by lower oxygen solubility, reduced Southern water delivery, and winter convective mixing rather than productivity. This study highlights a general trend of weaker OMZs in glacial than interglacial periods, though the mechanisms may not be identical, offering insights into OMZ dynamics under climate change in the past. 

Abstract Aerogels are highly porous structures produced by replacing the liquid solvent of a gel with air without causing a collapse in the solid network. Unlike conventional fabrication methods, additive manufacturing (AM) has been applied to fabricate 3D aerogels with customized geometries specific to their applications, designed pore morphologies, multimaterial structures, etc. To date, three major AM technologies (extrusion, inkjet, and stereolithography) followed by a drying process have been proposed to additively manufacture 3D functional aerogels. 3D‐printed aerogels and porous scaffolds showed great promise for a variety of applications, including tissue engineering, electrochemical energy storage, controlled drug delivery, sensing, and soft robotics. In this review, the details of steps included in the AM of aerogels and porous scaffolds are discussed, and a general frame is provided for AM of those. Then, the different postprinting processes are addressed to achieve the porosity (after drying); and mechanical strength, functionality, or both (after postdrying thermal or chemical treatments) are provided. Furthermore, the applications of the 3D‐printed aerogels/porous scaffolds made from a variety of materials are also highlighted. The review is concluded with the current challenges and an outlook for the next generation of 3D‐printed aerogels and porous scaffolds.