Search for: All records

We combine equation of state of dense matter up to twice nuclear saturation density (nsat = 0.16 fm−3 ) obtained using chiral effective field theory (χEFT), and recent observations of neutron stars to gain insights about the high-density matter encountered in their cores. A key element in our study is the recent Bayesian analysis of correlated EFT truncation errors based on order-byorder calculations up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in the χEFT expansion. We refine the bounds on the maximum mass imposed by causality at high densities, and provide stringent limits on the maximum and minimum radii of ∼ 1.4 M and ∼ 2.0 M stars. Including χEFT predictions from nsat to 2 nsat reduces the permitted ranges of the radius of a 1.4 M star, R1.4, by ∼ 3.5 km. If observations indicate R1.4 < 11.2 km, our study implies that either the squared speed of sound c 2 s > 1/2 for densities above 2 nsat, or that χEFT breaks down below 2 nsat. We also comment on the nature of the secondary compact object in GW190814 with mass ' 2.6 M , and discuss the implications of massive neutron stars > 2.1 M (2.6 M ) in future radio and gravitational-wave searches. Some form of strongly interacting matter with c 2 s > 0.35 (0.55) must be realized in the cores of such massive neutron stars. In the absence of phase transitions below 2 nsat, the small tidal deformability inferred from GW170817 lends support for the relatively small pressure predicted by χEFT for the baryon density nB in the range 1−2 nsat. Together they imply that the rapid stiffening required to support a high maximum mass should occur only when nB & 1.5 − 1.8 nsat. 

The BigCode community, an open-scientific collaboration working on the responsible development of Large Language Models for Code (Code LLMs), introduces StarCoder and StarCoderBase: 15.5B parameter models with 8K context length, infilling capabilities and fast large-batch inference enabled by multi-query attention. StarCoderBase is trained on 1 trillion tokens sourced from The Stack, a large collection of permissively licensed GitHub repositories with inspection tools and an opt-out process. We fine-tuned StarCoderBase on 35B Python tokens, resulting in the creation of StarCoder. We perform the most comprehensive evaluation of Code LLMs to date and show that StarCoderBase outperforms every open Code LLM that supports multiple programming languages and matches or outperforms the OpenAI code-cushman-001 model. Furthermore, StarCoder outperforms every model that is fine-tuned on Python, can be prompted to achieve 40% pass@1 on HumanEval, and still retains its performance on other programming languages. We take several important steps towards a safe open-access model release, including an improved PII redaction pipeline and a novel attribution tracing tool, and make the StarCoder models publicly available under a more commercially viable version of the Open Responsible AI Model license. 

Abstract The computational fluid dynamics of hurricane rapid intensification (RI) is examined through idealized simulations using two codes: a community‐based, finite‐difference/split‐explicit model (WRF) and a spectral‐element/semi‐implicit model (NUMA). The focus of the analysis is on the effects of implicit numerical dissipation (IND) in the energetics of the vortex response to heating, which embodies the fundamental dynamics in the hurricane RI process. The heating considered here is derived from observations: four‐dimensional, fully nonlinear, latent heating/cooling rates calculated from airborne Doppler radar measurements collected in a hurricane undergoing RI. The results continue to show significant IND in WRF relative to NUMA with a reduction in various intensity metrics: (a) time‐integrated, mean kinetic energy values in WRF are ∼20% lower than NUMA and (b) peak, localized wind speeds in WRF are ∼12 m/s lower than NUMA. Values of the eddy diffusivity in WRF need to be reduced by ∼50% from those in NUMA to produce a similar intensity time series. Kinetic energy budgets demonstrate that the pressure contribution is the main factor in the model differences with WRF producing smaller energy input to the vortex by ∼23%, on average. The low‐order spatial discretization of the pressure gradient in WRF is implicated in the IND. In addition, the eddy transport term is found to have a largely positive impact on the vortex intensification with a mean contribution of ∼20%. Overall, these results have important implications for the research and operational forecasting communities that use WRF and WRF‐like numerical models.