Search for: All records

Cancer heterogeneity analysis is essential for precision medicine. Most of the existing heterogeneity analyses only consider a single type of data and ignore the possible sparsity of important features. In cancer clinical practice, it has been suggested that two types of data, pathological imaging and omics data, are commonly collected and can produce hierarchical heterogeneous structures, in which the refined sub‐subgroup structure determined by omics features can be nested in the rough subgroup structure determined by the imaging features. Moreover, sparsity pursuit has extraordinary significance and is more challenging for heterogeneity analysis, because the important features may not be the same in different subgroups, which is ignored by the existing heterogeneity analyses. Fortunately, rich information from previous literature (for example, those deposited in PubMed) can be used to assist feature selection in the present study. Advancing from the existing analyses, in this study, we propose a novel sparse hierarchical heterogeneity analysis framework, which can integrate two types of features and incorporate prior knowledge to improve feature selection. The proposed approach has satisfactory statistical properties and competitive numerical performance. A TCGA real data analysis demonstrates the practical value of our approach in analyzing data heterogeneity and sparsity. 

Abstract Summary Heterogeneity is a hallmark of many complex human diseases, and unsupervised heterogeneity analysis has been extensively conducted using high-throughput molecular measurements and histopathological imaging features. ‘Classic’ heterogeneity analysis has been based on simple statistics such as mean, variance and correlation. Network-based analysis takes interconnections as well as individual variable properties into consideration and can be more informative. Several Gaussian graphical model (GGM)-based heterogeneity analysis techniques have been developed, but friendly and portable software is still lacking. To facilitate more extensive usage, we develop the R package HeteroGGM, which conducts GGM-based heterogeneity analysis using the advanced penaliztaion techniques, can provide informative summary and graphical presentation, and is efficient and friendly. Availabilityand implementation The package is available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=HeteroGGM. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. 

Abstract Heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and many other complex diseases. This study has been partly motivated by the unsupervised heterogeneity analysis for complex diseases based on molecular and imaging data, for which, network‐based analysis, by accommodating the interconnections among variables, can be more informative than that limited to mean, variance, and other simple distributional properties. In the literature, there has been very limited research on network‐based heterogeneity analysis, and a common limitation shared by the existing techniques is that the number of subgroups needs to be specified a priori or in an ad hoc manner. In this article, we develop a penalized fusion approach for heterogeneity analysis based on the Gaussian graphical model. It applies penalization to the mean and precision matrix parameters to generate regularized and interpretable estimates. More importantly, a fusion penalty is imposed to “automatedly” determine the number of subgroups and generate more concise, reliable, and interpretable estimation. Consistency properties are rigorously established, and an effective computational algorithm is developed. The heterogeneity analysis of non‐small‐cell lung cancer based on single‐cell gene expression data of the Wnt pathway and that of lung adenocarcinoma based on histopathological imaging data not only demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed approach but also lead to interesting new findings. 

Abstract In cancer research, supervised heterogeneity analysis has important implications. Such analysis has been traditionally based on clinical/demographic/molecular variables. Recently, histopathological imaging features, which are generated as a byproduct of biopsy, have been shown as effective for modeling cancer outcomes, and a handful of supervised heterogeneity analysis has been conducted based on such features. There are two types of histopathological imaging features, which are extracted based on specific biological knowledge and using automated imaging processing software, respectively. Usingbothtypes of histopathological imaging features, our goal is to conduct the first supervised cancer heterogeneity analysisthat satisfies a hierarchical structure. That is, the first type of imaging features defines a rough structure, and the second type defines a nested and more refined structure. A penalization approach is developed, which has been motivated by but differs significantly from penalized fusion and sparse group penalization. It has satisfactory statistical and numerical properties. In the analysis of lung adenocarcinoma data, it identifies a heterogeneity structure significantly different from the alternatives and has satisfactory prediction and stability performance.