Search for: All records

Stream bryophytes (mosses and liverworts) are widely recognized as important macroinvertebrate habitats, but their overall role in the stream ecosystem, particularly in nutrient cycling, remains understudied. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire, USA, contains some of the most extensively researched streams in the world, yet few studies mention their bryophytes. Perhaps this is because early estimates place bryophyte coverage in these streams at an insignificant 2%. However, data from 2019 show that contemporary coverage ranges from 4 to 40% among streams. To investigate how stream bryophyte cover may be changing over time and influencing stream nutrient stocks, we conducted field surveys, measured the mass of organic and inorganic bryophyte contents, and quantified nutrient uptake with bottle incubations of bryophyte mats. This study marks a novel attempt to map stream bryophyte coverage with estimates of C, P, and N stocks and fluxes. From our 2022 field surveys, we found that median bryophyte coverage varied across streams in the same catchment (0–41.4%) and shifted from just 3 y prior. We estimate that these bryophyte mats stored between 14 and 414 g of organic matter per m2 of stream in the form of live biomass and captured particulates. Within 12 h of light incubation, 35 out of 36 bryophyte clump samples sorbed peak historical water-column concentrations of PO43– as measured in the Hubbard Brook stream chemistry record. In Bear Brook, our scaled estimate of bryophyte mat NO3– uptake (2.3 g N/y) constitutes a substantial portion of previously estimated whole-stream NO3– uptake (12 g N/y). Cumulatively, our data demonstrate that bryophytes and their associated mineral substrates and biota—known as the bryosphere—are crucial in facilitating headwater stream nutrient cycling. These bryospheres may contribute significantly to interannual variability in stream nutrient concentrations within nutrient-poor streams, especially in climate-sensitive regions. 

This is the data and code associated with "Stream bryophytes promote 'cryptic' productivity in highly oligotrophic headwaters. Recent observations document increased abundance of algae in the headwater streams of Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF). It is possible that this 'greening up' of HBEF streams may be due to climate change with rising temperatures, altered terrestrial phenology, and shifting hydrologic regimes. Alternatively, stream 'greening' could be due to the slow recovery of stream chemistry from decades of acid rain, which have led to rising stream water pH, declining concentrations of toxic Al3+, and extremely low solute concentrations. Three years of weekly algal measurements on contrasting substrates, 6 nutrient enrichment experiments reveal important new insights about the interactions between these two groups of autotrophs. We predicted that light availability, hydrologic disturbance and nutrient limitation were all important determinants of algal biomass in streams. To evaluate the relative strength and hierarchy of these limiting factors, we used nutrient diffusing substrates to investigate the role of nutrients for algae and compared algal accrual rate on artificial rock vs. moss substrates in stream channels vs. weir ponds to assess the role of hydrologic disturbance and scour. Our surveys and experiments spanned across seasons and local light regimes. Algal biomass was substantially higher in protected weir ponds than in stream channels, and in both habitats, algal biomass was substantially higher on artificial moss substrates than on tiles. Taken together, these results suggest that moss can provide physical protection from flood scour. Algal biomass instream on both substrate types was higher in high light seasons (pre-leaf out) and well-lit habitats indicating strong light limitation. Results from a series of 6 nutrient diffusing substrate experiments over the course of 2 years provided little evidence of nutrient limitation instream. The most striking finding of our investigation is the previously unsuspected role of stream bryophytes in providing critical refugia for algae in these steep, heavily shaded and oligotrophic headwaters. Shifts in stream productivity over time are likely to be closely tied to changes in bryophyte cover. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 

The relationship between (a) the structure and composition of the landscape around an individual's home and (b) environmental perceptions and health outcomes has been well demonstrated (eg the value of vegetation cover to well‐being). Few studies, however, have examined how multiple landscape features (eg vegetation and water cover) relate to perceptions of multiple environmental problems (eg air or water quality) and whether those relationships hold over time. We utilized a long‐term dataset of geolocated telephone surveys in Baltimore, Maryland, to identify relationships between residents’ perceptions of environmental problems and nearby landcover. Residents of neighborhoods with more vegetation or located closer to water were less likely to perceive environmental problems. Water quality was one exception to this trend, in that people were more likely to perceive water‐quality problems when nearby water cover was greater. These trends endured over time, suggesting that these relationships are stable and therefore useful for informing policy aimed at minimizing perceived environmental problems. 

The Baltimore Ecosystem Study stream biofilm bacterial community composition was obtained from 8 long-term sampling network sites in and near the Gwynns Falls watershed to examine how bacterial communities differ along an urban-rural gradient. Sampling was conducted at the same time as stream chemistry sampling on 18 June 2014 and 21 Oct 2014. Note: biofilm samples were taken about 50 meters east from the Carroll Park monitoring station, just under the I95 highway overpass, due to high water depth, high water flow, and lack of rock substrates for sampling. This dataset presents the number of sequences matching the taxonomic classifications in a reference database of 16S rRNA genes. See the full metadata record for detailed methods. 

Abstract All animals carry specialized microbiomes, and their gut microbiota are continuously released into the environment through excretion of waste. Here we propose themeta-gutas a novel conceptual framework that addresses the ability of the gut microbiome released from an animal to function outside the host and alter biogeochemical processes mediated by microbes. We demonstrate this dynamic in the hippopotamus (hippo) and the pools they inhabit. We used natural field gradients and experimental approaches to examine fecal and pool water microbial communities and aquatic biogeochemistry across a range of hippo inputs. Sequencing using 16S RNA methods revealed community coalescence between hippo gut microbiomes and the active microbial communities in hippo pools that received high inputs of hippo feces. The shared microbiome between the hippo gut and the waters into which they excrete constitutes ameta-gutsystem that could influence the biogeochemistry of recipient ecosystems and provide a reservoir of gut microbiomes that could influence other hosts. We propose thatmeta-gutdynamics may also occur where other animal species congregate in high densities, particularly in aquatic environments. 

Abstract Animals can impact freshwater ecosystem structure and function in ways that persist well beyond the animal’s active presence. These legacy effects can last for months, even decades, and often increase spatial and temporal heterogeneity within a system. Herein, we review examples of structural, biogeochemical, and trophic legacies from animals in stream and river ecosystems with a focus on large vertebrates. We examine how the decline or disappearance of many native animal populations has led to the loss of their legacy effects. We also demonstrate how anthropogenically altered animal populations, such as livestock and invasive species, provide new legacy effects that may partially replace lost animal legacies. However, these new effects often have important functional differences, including stronger, more widespread and homogenizing effects. Understanding the influence of animal legacy effects is particularly important as native animal populations continue to decline and disappear from many ecosystems, because they illustrate the long-term and often unanticipated consequences of biodiversity loss. We encourage the conservation and restoration of native species to ensure that both animal populations and their legacy effects continue to support the structure and function of river ecosystems.